it's always about energy it's not about anything else it's a thermodynamic argument and because we've built a world which gets to our black Knight's friend's original question I never
- Source
- The Science of Sunlight and Cold: This Will Transform Your Health - Dr. Jack Kruse · 01:36:35.400 ↗
- Concept
- thermodynamics
- Score
- 8 · always · never · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · yt0.781
What do you mean that it's all talk and not reflected in the formalism? And also port, because people keep hearing this word port. Port is spelled P-O-R-T and refers to the boundary ports. Yes, there are boundary ports, there are other ports. It's very easily explained if we write it down. We can't do that right now. They're simple examples. Well, the point is, what is not reflected is… You have a total energy that's conserved, and of course you can define a potential and a kinetic energy, and you s…
yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt
- 02 · yt0.771
I mean even physicists don't agree on what energy is and there's been debates you know Richard Fineman who was like this amazing science communicator physicist said like we don't even know what energy is and what's the best way to define it because there are all of these forms thermal energy heat right energy electromagnetic uh kinetic energy movement speed right uh potential energy so uh energy kind of manifests in all of these different ways so in in a nutshell I think the best definition I've I've heard heard uh from my wife Nosha is uh who's a biohysicist energy is the potential for change…
yt/nMkQUlBtFlk-improve-energy-longevity-by-optimizing-mitochondria-dr-marti/transcript.txt
- 03 · yt0.762
What what they don't tell you is that soon after that finding w was obtained there another another group of equally prominent group said oh Libot was wrong he made he made a simple arithmetic error and there is no such thing as a high energy phosphate bond and that was tested later by two two guys whom I know because they're in the muscle contraction field and and they they also found experiment experimentally that there was no such thing as a high energy phosphate bond doesn't exist. Now a lot of people are not aware of that. I can tell by the expression on your face that maybe you haven't he…
yt/YrwbDsTx0Uw-water-the-matrix-and-engine-of-life-pioneer-in-water-researc/transcript.txt
- 04 · _intake0.759
**“Everything is energy and information and that is all there is to it. Match the frequency to the reality you want and you can not help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics.”** *— Anonymous*
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/quantum-biology-1-the-zero-entropy-system.md
- 05 · _intake0.755
That is a very faulty assumption. Life on this planet evolved from the deep oceans to land. Therefore the biochemistry that dictate’s modern energy generation can not be generalized to all life forms on this planet. It can be studied on those mammals, animals, and bacteria that have undergone natural selection to a warmer climate and have assumed a warm adapted diet. Just because we use and live this way, has no bearing on what we evolved from, or if energy generation is somehow more efficient or less efficient in a different thermoplastic environment. Sleep is the most important part of our b…
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/cold-thermogenesis-8.md
- 06 · _intake0.754
Tesla said it. Einstein Agreed. Modern physics has proved it. It is now factual to say that everything, including our own bodies, is made up of energy vibrating at different frequencies.
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/ubiquitination-9-frequency-awakening.md
- 07 · blog0.752
We can thus press the point even more by noting that we make claims and construct arguments that appear to involve quantification over properties, with quantifiers reaching (i) over predicate positions, or even (ii) over both subject and predicate positions (Castañeda 1976). [ 2 ] As regards (i) consider: this apple is red; this tomato is red; hence, there is something that this apples is and this tomato also is. As for (ii), consider: wisdom is more important than beauty; Mary is wise and Elisabeth is beautiful; hence, there is something that Mary is which is more important than Mary is. Espe…
blog/plato-stanford-edu/properties.md
- 08 · _intake0.751
We talk about why the conventional wisdom of calories in and calories out is just partially explained by the second law of thermodynamics. Many bright minds in the blogosphere invoke the second law of thermodynamics when speaking of calories, but few have integrated a biologic framework with modern quantum physics to explain understand how useful work might be done in a molecular system when one form of stored energy is converted into another. In other words, how might thermalized energy be unavailable for work? The possibility of this thought is controversial in our community, but fully accep…
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/the-paleo-summit-is-the-paleo-diet-the-answer.md
- 09 · blog0.750
The full certainty of the present treatise time is powerless to abrogate. If your Majesty will deign to peruse it at your leisure, you will easily perceive that my mind is profoundly versed in this study. (1) All genuine and judicious philosophers have traced back things to their first principles, that is to say, those comprehended in the threefold division of Nature. The generation of animals they have attributed to a mingling of the male and female in sexual union; that of vegetables to their own proper seed; while as the principle of minerals they have assigned earth and viscous water. (2) …
blog/www-sacred-texts-com/the-stone-of-the-philosophers-by-edward-kelly.md
- 10 · blog0.743
Let this, then, be our invocation of the Gods, to which I add an exhortation of myself to speak in such manner as will be most intelligible to you, and will most accord with my own intent. First then, in my judgment, we must make a distinction and ask, What is that which always is and has no becoming; and what is that which is always becoming and never is? That which is apprehended by intelligence and reason is always in the same state; but that which is conceived by opinion with the help of sensation and without reason, is always in a process of becoming and perishing and never really is. Now…
blog/www-sacred-texts-com/timaeus.md
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/02-physics/