it's accessible at low energies. It just requires some novel constructions. Yeah. And that one's also funny because it's really a classical effect, but it's quantum detected. Right. So one thing I didn't know because I'm not a physicist, um, is that there's this thing called a phenomenologist. I didn't know what a phenomenologist was. I just thought they were people who were closer to the standard model. I think what a phenomenologist is, is a bridge object between the pure theory
- Concept
- standard model
- Score
- 4 · must · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · yt0.852
So you can't just say, "Oh, these are just two ways of talking about the same account of the world." They're clearly contradictory accounts of the world. Absolutely. And and where did the word, if you happen to know, interpretation in quantum mechanics first get in? And and the reason I ask is in classical physics there are of course distinct formulations of classical mechanics. You can write down Newton's equations in a straightforward differential form. you can write down a Hamiltonian approach to it. Uh I mean often we don't call those different interpretations. We call them maybe different…
yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt
- 02 · yt0.836
I'm going to give you a tiny little bit of evidence that this claim is actually true. The first bit of evidence is mostly rhetorical because you see a picture like this, it doesn't look very impressive. You're like, I could have drawn that. My kid could have drawn that. It's just a cartoon. I'm not going to believe your physical theory unless you show me the equations behind it. Well, here you are. This is the equation. This is what Nobel laurate Frank Wilch has dubbed the core theory of modern physics. It consists of two parts. It is general relativity, Albert Einstein's theory of gravity, an…
yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt
- 03 · yt0.833
I wanted to begin with a, I don't know, a pet peeve of mine that I think you also agree with. When it comes to quantum mechanics, unlike any other theory that we discuss, people use this word "interpretation." The interpretations of quantum mechanics. And to me, as we'll get into it, the interpretations are not interpretations. They're different theories. And some of the interpretations don't even qualify as a complete theory. And so that just seems to be a complete misnomer in the way we describe these things. - I couldn't agree more. And I got this view from Bryce DeWitt, who was my supervis…
yt/Af5LICjFIBc-what-is-quantum-mechanics-really-telling-us-world-science-fe/transcript.txt
- 04 · yt0.832
Quantum field of electrons well defined in physics. Okay. Quantum physics. I say this quantum field has consciousness and has free will. Then I call a siy because it's not the quantum fields of physics is but it is everything that physics is saying plus consciousness and free will. Now all of a sudden you have an entity that can evolve and can know itself and everything else because is a parked hole of one. In this uh way of thinking all of a sudden you you are connecting immediately physics which are the quantum fields with spirituality which is the fact that these fields are conscious and ha…
yt/d6NHRB5V1eE-top-physicist-science-spirituality-merge-in-this-new-theory-/transcript.txt
- 05 · yt0.830
Therefore, you're working in two realms. You have the You have the quantum realm, but then the measuring system is in another realm. Yeah. level up, right? And and then not only that, but the measuring equipment has been designed and that's a level up. And then it's being utilized by that level, which is a level up from that. So, so just by virtue of the the the whole system of measuring, you can see that there is a hierarchy. It's not flat, right? Is that Is that partly what you're saying? You You've got the point perfectly and you've expressed it perfectly. Exactly. Um the cosmos is hierarch…
yt/8NWHGX53agc-dr-wolfgang-smith-renowned-physicist-on-vertical-causation-i/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.829
You give me the quantum state of the universe right now. This is the equation that tells you what happens next. It is not teological. It is not moral. It does not care what you do. It does not judge you. There is no goal or purpose towards which it strives. There's no causes and effects in this equation. It's just a pattern just like 6 7 8 9 10. Now you might object a slightly more sophisticated version of the previous objection is okay you have equations but I don't believe that your equations are truly fundamental unless they can fit on a t-shirt. So I prove to you that that can happen. Once…
yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt
- 07 · pubmed0.829
We still lack any consensus about what one is actually talking about as one uses quantum mechanics. There is a gap between the abstract terms in which the theory is couched and the phenomena the theory enables each of us to account for so well. Because it has no practical consequences for how we each use quantum mechanics to deal with physical problems, this cognitive dissonance has managed to coexist with the quantum theory from the very beginning. The absence of conceptual clarity for almost a century suggests that the problem might lie in some implicit misconceptions about the nature of sci…
pubmed/PMID-30232960-making-better-sense-of-quantum-mechanics/info.md
- 08 · yt0.828
How do we know that this isn't just pure mathematics? And that would take us into a wonderful conversation along the lines of the material that we just discussed. So yeah, I think he would warm to these ideas pretty quickly. Do you think we're sort of in the realm of philosophy here? One of the criticisms that I see of string theory as somebody who doesn't understand the first thing about it is that because of this lack of experimental data, you can say that in principle it could be tested. But there are all kinds of philosophical theories that in principle we could test. Ideas about personal …
yt/o9z5il_FQUw-string-theory-multiverse-and-divine-design-brian-greene/transcript.txt
- 09 · yt0.828
The body is is a quantum classical structure that exists in space and time but is also connected with this quantum reality and that's why it is a monism. Okay. If you take the field of electrons the quantum field of electrons the electrons are not objects separate from the fields. There in qu in physics in quantum physics an electron is a state of a field is some structure some form that appears in the field itself just like a wave of the sea a wave of the sea is part of the sea cannot be separated from the sea. So the properties of the wave are actually the properties of the field. The proper…
yt/d6NHRB5V1eE-top-physicist-science-spirituality-merge-in-this-new-theory-/transcript.txt
- 10 · yt0.826
What do you mean that it's all talk and not reflected in the formalism? And also port, because people keep hearing this word port. Port is spelled P-O-R-T and refers to the boundary ports. Yes, there are boundary ports, there are other ports. It's very easily explained if we write it down. We can't do that right now. They're simple examples. Well, the point is, what is not reflected is… You have a total energy that's conserved, and of course you can define a potential and a kinetic energy, and you s…
yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/02-physics/