bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

relativity

thing. And it really is spin six cross spin four because GU, and I don't know that you've, you and I have even had this discussion is a machine that could also accept a one 11 spacetime or a one 15, any multiple of four dimensions with one of them taken as time results in a GU. Why would a one 11 work? Sorry, did I say one 11? I meant. Seven 11. Seven 11. I meant one seven. No, no, I'm messing you up now. One 11. Yeah. No, why? Because it has to add up to. Well, 12 is a multiple of four.
Concept
relativity
Score
6 · must · causes · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.976

    > thing. And it really is spin six cross spin four because GU, and I don't know that you've, you and I have even had this discussion is a machine that could also accept a one 11 spacetime or a one 15, any multiple of four dimensions with one of them taken as time results in a GU. Why would a one 11 work? Sorry, did I say one 11? I meant. Seven 11. Seven 11. I meant one seven. No, no, I'm messing you up now. One 11. Yeah. No, why? Because it has to add up to. Well, 12 is a multiple of four.

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/relativity/003-thing.md

  2. 02 · yt0.843

    I accept general relativity,  but everything we do is slightly wrong. We call,   we call Pati-Salam by the wrong name. We have  the wrong grand unified real forms of the group.   SU five is really SU three comma, uh, SU three  comma two. SO 10 is really spin 10 and spin 10   is really spin six comma four. Like the amount of  wear and tear on the mind to hear somebody say,   no, no, no. I accept all these things, but  we've, we've minorly got everything shifted. I   think there's a huge barrier to entry in Geo. But 

    yt/ILlhFKuu3NQ-geometric-unity-unifying-all-forces-generations-eric-weinste/transcript.txt

  3. 03 · yt0.808

    So those are three protractors that we probably feel more comfortable with. But then there are these weird three extra numbers which measure the angle between time and the x direction, time in the y direction, and time in the z direction. So that's four rulers down the diagonal of the matrix. Three of them are regular rulers. One of them is a time ruler or a watch that are being calibrated. And the remaining six numbers are three regular protractors measuring an angle of space with space and then three bizarre protractors that measure the angle of time with X, time with Y, and time with Z. So

    yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.805

    And then how and why is what  we would call the equations in the Lagrangian.   And so that's a pretty good idea about how to  remember how a physicist thinks about reality at   the deepest level. Tell me where it's going on.  Tell me what the equipment and the players is,   are, and tell me what the rules are and what the  consequences are. So basically geometric unity   says that we have this wrong, not wildly wrong  in the sense of I can't connect it. It's very   connected to what I'm claiming and what Einstein 

    yt/ILlhFKuu3NQ-geometric-unity-unifying-all-forces-generations-eric-weinste/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.798

    Or 1 1 2 3 4 5 6. 1 1 2 3 4 5. All of these are six. So, in our head we think about it. That is also six, but it is double time on recitation. Think about it. 1 2 3 4 5 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6. You see it fits within that six pulses, that time frame, right? Now, if I was to extend six, let's say I go to eight. That being two pulses. 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6. That is eight. So, I got a six. I got a eight. In the algebraic progression, what should be the next one? Six, eight. 10. How do I do a 10? Eight I did. 10 would be what? 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6. So, I got a six. I 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6. So, I got a six. I got

    yt/ieI3C1Jxftk-the-classical-music-of-india-the-mathematics-behind-the-soun/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.795

    So that means that the the distance itself is the square root that so if I'm going to think talk about spacetime you know manowsky spacetime that distance has to be the square root of this marovian commute time that's outside of spacetime and when you take a square root there's there's not one answer there's two plus and minus you can you know like the square root of four is not just two it's also minus two because minus 2^2 is also four. So, so that means that if I start off with this marov dynamics outside of spacetime and I'm I'm forced to say that there are two different kinds of spacetime

    yt/Hf1q-bZMEo4-what-are-traces-of-consciousness-a-new-breakthrough-unifying/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · _intake0.793

    - [`001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th`](relativity/001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th.md) — score=8 `03:12:14.200` — do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end o - [`002-the-top-clock-always-has-to-run-faster-than-every-other-and-`](relativity/002-the-top-clock-always-has-to-run-faster-than-every-other-and-.md) — score=7 `01:16:16.200` — the top clock always has to run faster than every other. And the reason is a physics reason. It's tied back to Einstein' -

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/INDEX.md

  8. 08 · yt0.793

    Where he was under house arrest in Florence. Thank you for taking me there. Um, what I would say is the problem is the following. Imagine you go to a seminar in theoretical physics. It might begin with the following world words. I'd like to thank everybody for coming. Let us assume uh that X1 comma 3 is a space-time manifold. As soon as you've said that, the game is already over. You can't do physics at the deepest level after you've said those words. In my opinion, the problem is Einstein baked in this assumption of a space-time metric at such a fundamental level that we can't actually do any

    yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.790

    I mean, all the textbooks--I mean, all the novels say, "When I was going down the wrong path, then I did a 180." Right? So, everyone knows. In fact, I saw a book by a violinist who said, "I was going down all the wrong things and I did a 360." So, you realize that 360 is not really a way to reform your life, but among the physicists it struck a chord. In physics, a 360 is really not a trivial thing to do. It turns out, the particles in the world are divided into bosons and fermions, and half of the particles are bosons and roughly half are fermions. An electron is a fermion; the light quantum

    yt/mx2P1_M-7UA-9-rotations-part-i-dynamics-of-rigid-bodies/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · yt0.788

    Then you will say E_1 - R_1 I_1 - R_3 times I_1 - I_2. Now let's look here. You keep going the same way, but here you drop by an amount E_2. Then you've come over here and you come to the other end and you get 0. Now somebody can say, "Hey, why don't I start here, go around that loop and say that voltage difference is 0?" I'm getting the third equation, but there are only two unknowns. So you math-minded people should sort of know what will happen if I write a third equation. What do you think will happen? Student: Nothing. Prof: What do you mean, nothing will happen? Student: It's not going t

    yt/HXRjSfre6kc-8-circuits-and-magnetism-i/transcript.txt

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/