Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · yt0.766

   But wait a second how can we make sense out of that statement the universe is infinite if we are measuring it from a sense of having a beginning. And this is what we're going to talk about now. If we value the pursuit of knowledge we must be free to follow wherever that search may lead us. The free mind is not a barking dog to be tethered on a 10-ft chain. Today, I want to talk about two specific energies that can be expressed through this image. The energy that flows here is male and female energy. Male energy is focused, and female energy is creative and random. Neither of them is greater no…

   yt/09YGgT8XN_I-flower-of-life-and-sacred-geometry-movie/transcript.txt

2. 02 · yt0.760

   black you're in motion I'm at rest and my clocks are indeed simultaneous this is the framework from which it started in the Lorentz transformations were put in but if you just applied the Lorentz transformations outside of this framework you don't have any of this Shanahan says of the particles of waves quote time is retarding but no time is not retarding there is a slowing down due to velocity of physical processes by which we measure time it is a local time that is the processes in that clock there are slowing down if the clock is in motion at velocity V but STR is no physical explanation no…

   yt/Qz_uYO6MvJ4-bergson-s-holographic-theory-25-pribram-bohm-short-revisit/transcript.txt

3. 03 · blog0.758

   Concerning the more prominent sort of change, namely, accident-replacement, two further questions were debated: one, “Does change form a single kind or not?” and two, “Where does locomotion occur, that is to say, do the initial atoms prior to the motion or the subsequent atoms after the motion receive the accident of motion?” One argument used to show that there are several kinds of motion observed that a single kind cannot bring about contradictory things, as for example, a fire does not produce cooling and heating; however, motions do bring about contraries such as being to the right or bein…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/arabic-and-islamic-natural-philosophy-and-natural-science.md

4. 04 · blog0.757

   Then it looks different at a different time, but still is essentially the same. In all these cases we orient according to differences and coherence of existence, and not very reliably at that. I want to show with this shaggy sheep tale that the question of continuous existence throughout different positions and qualities is not easily resolved, and therefore we should be carefully before we discount all talk of "double existence, parallel worlds etc.". Last amended June 11, 1989 -- Page NEXTRECORD 295 Existence is hard to imagine and contradicts with experience and commonsense unless we postul…

   blog/www-sacred-texts-com/internet-book-of-shadows-supradimensionality-part-i-i-o-internet-sacred-text-arc.md

5. 05 · blog0.755

   Several passages in Descartes’ analysis of motion seem to support this strong variety of relationism: “we cannot conceive of the body AB being transported from the vicinity of the body CD without also understanding that the body CD is transported from the vicinity of the body AB ” (Pr II 29). Hence, “all the real and positive properties which are in moving bodies, and by virtue of which we say they move, are also found in those [bodies] contiguous to them, even though we consider the second group to be at rest” (Pr II 30). This form of relational motion has been dubbed the “reciprocity of tran…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/descartes-physics.md

6. 06 · yt0.750

   green there can't prove that he is at rest another observer can claim that he isn't he's moving he's moving at a velocity V therefore his clocks are no longer in sync that is reciprocity because it can go vice versa if the green can say no mr.

   yt/Qz_uYO6MvJ4-bergson-s-holographic-theory-25-pribram-bohm-short-revisit/transcript.txt

7. 07 · blog0.747

   There is something appealing in this argument. As Priest and Routley put it, “in change… there is at each stage a moment when the changing item is both in a given state, because it has just reached that state, but also not in that state, because it is not stationary but moving through and beyond that state” (Priest, Routley and Norman, 1989, p. 7). Think of a body coming to rest at a given time, and compare it with the same body proceeding on to further motion. There must be something about the body at that instant which distinguishes the two scenarios, or there could be nothing at the time to…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/change-and-inconsistency.md

8. 08 · yt0.745

   If you look at them from one special frame of reference, when this is gone and you say that one is the whole state. When this one's gone, this one is the whole state. But it's got to do that simultaneously. Simultaneous doesn't mean anything relativistically. What means something? Well, does it go back? I mean, maybe when this is gone Anyway, it doesn't make sense. The only way to make it make sense is that it goes way back to where they separated. And then in a certain sense, it already knew which one was going to go. That doesn't make much sense, either. But in this article, I tried to devel…

   yt/vC4HNcqTQXk-roger-penrose-on-mind-consciousness-closer-to-truth-chats/transcript.txt

9. 09 · blog0.744

   This asymmetry is often assumed to coincide with a temporal asymmetry according to which effects do not precede their causes. [ 4 ] This gives rise to the time asymmetry challenge that contrasts the time-asymmetry of causal relations with the purported fact that physical laws make no distinction between the past and future direction. This contrast is offered as a reason for why causal relations cannot be a part of physical theorizing. The time-asymmetry challenge can be represented in premise-conclusion form as follows: Causal relations are temporally asymmetric. The physical laws of our well-…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/causation-in-physics.md

10. 10 · blog0.743

    Obviously we have no sense and no feeling for what`s happening when we go beyond our 3+1 (space+time) system. So the new mental experiment leads nowhere. It`s worth it to demonstrate that no practical model comes from mental speculations in this direction. But we can derive a description from our "experiences" with low-dimensional systems. Keeping the last paradigms in mind and adding a new dimension, the Ennead, we can formulate the new paradigm by same method as follows: "At the same place in space at the same time there ARE different conditions possible at different E-dimensions." Exactly l…

    blog/www-sacred-texts-com/internet-book-of-shadows-supradimensionality-part-i-i-o-internet-sacred-text-arc.md