well the number one thing I now know this is the only speculation I'm giving you in this podcast because everything I've said to this point I know to be axiomatically true it doesn't need to go through a randomized controlled trial do you want to know why because the laws that my opinion is based on are physical laws they're not subject to a randomized it's not theoretical correct the photoelectric effect is present on Earth just as it is in Andromeda we know that so the
- Concept
- photoelectric
- Score
- 4 · must · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · _intake0.806
This post might be one of the most foundational experiments of why I believe that life is photoelectric and that we live within an electric universe. The “accepted solar model of the sun is based upon nuclear fusion and supported fundamentally by Kirchhoff’s laws.
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/why-is-the-sun-electric-and-not-nuclear-why-do-mitochrondrics-care.md
- 02 · yt0.803
>> We do measure it by the rate at which distant galaxies are accelerating away from us. And it's this ridiculously small number, >> okay, >> in the units that we typically use to measure these things. And that translates into this particular number for the entropy, the number of states that the universe can possibly be found in. >> Right. Okay, that makes sense. >> But the question you asked before, if we could return it for a second, because it is issue, this issue of infinite number of worlds. Yes. Wait, wait, just before you get there, I just want to remind pe…
yt/NxMMd5kMu7o-exploring-hidden-dimensions-with-brian-greene/transcript.txt
- 03 · yt0.803
Oh, yeah, I know, I know, I like it, but I think for me, if you want to just make it really like a basic message to me, it's just like saying that in idealism we just say that that ocean is consciousness, right? The ocean is the mind at large. You can agree with that on that. Yeah. But I mean, assuming that we will eventually unify, our 17 quantum fields that we need to go into in grand unification theory. Yeah. Then I would say the resulting field is a model of this field of subjectivity. That is the ground our lives. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. And then I can sort of following that helps me also pe…
yt/DyzHYnOqIoU-10k-subscribers-a-q-a-with-bernardo-kastrup/transcript.txt
- 04 · _intake0.802
Here is a thought meant to resonate and reverberate in your neurons to show you the power of the elctromagnetic force: a mathematician would say that an electromagnetic wave travels from Andromeda to your eye, and he would show you many equations to prove it true. A quantum biologist, like myself, says that it does even more than that. It also extends the power and information in Andromeda’s light directly to your eye and brain to make some sense of it. Today, you can see Andromeda with your naked eye. It is 2.5 million light years away. When its light started heading your way to your eye, hum…
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-epigenetics-11-force.md
- 05 · yt0.802
They said, "Well, there must be a much bigger spread so that there's no no radiation." And they calculated this the smear factor, quite literally they called it the smear factor R zero would have to be on the order of an angstrom, five orders of magnitude bigger than what we had said. And that's for the nucleus, which makes the the atom bigger than the almost as big as a cell, you know, bigger than the the protein for sure. It'd be a micron. So, that didn't make any sense, but but that that made them happy because then they they could account for the lack of radiation. And but then they kind o…
yt/OoDi856wLPM-sir-roger-penrose-stuart-hameroff-collapsing-a-theory-of-qua/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.798
You give me the quantum state of the universe right now. This is the equation that tells you what happens next. It is not teological. It is not moral. It does not care what you do. It does not judge you. There is no goal or purpose towards which it strives. There's no causes and effects in this equation. It's just a pattern just like 6 7 8 9 10. Now you might object a slightly more sophisticated version of the previous objection is okay you have equations but I don't believe that your equations are truly fundamental unless they can fit on a t-shirt. So I prove to you that that can happen. Once…
yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt
- 07 · yt0.797
Built up Newton; shot down. Built up Maxwell; going to get shot down. So again, I have tried to drill into all of you the notion that people get shot down because somebody else does a new experiment that probes an entirely new regime which had not been seen before. So it's not that people were dumb; it's that given the information they had, they built the best theory that they could. And if you give me more additional information, more refined measurements, something to the tenth decimal place, I may have to change what I do. That's how it's going to be. So there's always going to be--for exam…
yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt
- 08 · yt0.797
you really just do have if for electrons for example you have point particles and they have locations but rather than following some deterministic trajectories those point particles move stochastically according to some rules okay and so all you can do is predict a probability of seeing them the rules are complicated I don't think we really told you exactly what the rules were or even I don't know if it the it's known what the rules are supposed to be in the most general cases but um one cru crucial feature of the rules is that they don't depend just on the state of the particle at any one tim…
yt/gINYis8BgSY-mindscape-323-jacob-barandes-on-indivisible-stochastic-quant/transcript.txt
- 09 · _intake0.794
Sooner or later, I think the principle will be accepted that knowledge regarding the link between blue light and non-native EMF’s and disease is imperfect, now and forever. Really it’s only common sense. The consequences of everything we do, or that is done to us, are imperfectly predictable, and the consequences of EMFs are no exception. “Hard scientific evidence” is not in the world ever, it only exists in the world’s mind as a core belief of fact, when in reality it’s just an opinion of a set of facts.
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-what-can-a-chart-tell-you.md
- 10 · yt0.792
There's not even a preferred velocity to the universe. This was figured out by Galileo, and Newton kind of took it on board. If you started everything moving at one mile per hour to the left, the world will look exactly the same. There's no actual frame of rest that you can measure. But there is space and there is time, and everyone agrees on what those two things mean. When I say I am one mile away from a certain other point, everyone in the universe agrees you are one mile away. Yes, that is correct. When I snap my fingers and say, "At the moment I snap my fingers, a certain thing is happeni…
yt/_TBNJyztai0-sean-carroll-explains-the-biggest-ideas-in-the-universe-full/transcript.txt
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/02-physics/