bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

photoelectric

electrons to go why because of that funny guy that it was from burn switzel that everybody talks about okay photoelectric effect guy okay you need to power your electrons with light to
Concept
photoelectric
Score
4 · must · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · yt0.812

    He got the Nobel Prize for predicting the photon, rather than for the Theory of Relativity, which was still controversial at that time. So he predicted the photons, based on actually fairly complicated thermodynamic statistical mechanics arguments. But one way to understand it is in terms of what's called the photoelectric effect. If you take a metal and you say "Where are the electrons in the metal?" As you know most electrons are orbiting the parent nucleus. But in a metal, some electrons are communal. Each atom donates one or two electrons to the whole metal. They can run all over the metal

    yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt

  2. 02 · _intake0.788

    ***Life is clever.*** It has figured out how to transform electrons out of everything we eat and keep them under control in cells until we need their energy. Electrons must flow in order for energy to be gained elsewhere. Electrons can be stored in tissues in semiconductors, but when they are stored they cannot act like a wave. They only have particle-like behavior. When the electron leaves the tissue its energy has to be thermalized to affect energy flows elsewhere in a cell. The electron, as it leaves our atoms, crystallizes out of Schrödinger’s mist like a genie emerging from his bottle; if

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-12-adrenal-fatigue.md

  3. 03 · _intake0.784

    Foodstuffs just happen to be the way life packages this energy transfer of electrons from plants to animals to deliver them to the inner mitochondrial membrane when we eat to use the power of the sun’s electrons to make chemical energy in ATP. This is how food codifies the photoelectric effect of visible light from our sun for the brain to perceive energy. Moreover, where these electrons come from, is very important for food and for proper brain function. I posted this question over two years ago to [some paleo luminaries and “they” did not get the connection at all.](/do-food-electrons-impart

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-and-epigenetics-4-light-water-magnetism.md

  4. 04 · yt0.781

    Then by accident they found out that instead of cranking up the brightness of the light, if you cranked up the frequency of light, slowly, suddenly beyond some frequency, you start getting electrons escaping the metal. So here's the graph you get. Let me just plot it if you like, ℏ times the w. In those days, they didn't know too much about ℏ. You can even plot w. It doesn't matter. And you plot here the kinetic energy of the emitted electron. And what you find is that below some minimum value, no electrons come out. There's nothing to plot. And once you cross a magical w, and anything higher

    yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.778

    The answer I'm giving you certainly works, makes all the predictions, never said anything wrong. Until something better comes to replace it, we will keep using it. Anyway, going back, the second experiment that confirmed the reality of photons. See, if you say light is made of particles and each one has an energy and momentum, do you understand why the photoelectric effect is a good test. It agrees with that picture. Individual particles come. Some have the energy to liberate the electron and some don't. And if individually, they cannot do it, it doesn't matter how many you send. Now you may h

    yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · _intake0.778

    - Photons and electrons from the sun and Earth provide the energy in the electromagnetic force to give the electro-motive force that jacks up electrons in foods, water and our bodies to higher energy orbits and beyond. **This quote from a future blog shows you the essence of the power of one of nature’s laws, the photoelectric effect.** What people do not understand is that we collect the electrons and photons from food, sun and the Earth in our tissues. Then we boost their energy with the power of the sun to add energy levels to the photons and electrons we collected. We then capture the ener

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/tilted-quilt-random-musings-2.md

  7. 07 · yt0.774

    You know the difference is? In the middle of it, you got an iron atom. Iron has a different atomic number. It It has um a few more electrons than magnesium. Why is this a big deal? Cuz the same thing that happens in chlorophyll happens in Joe. Happens in Jack. And and here's the irony. Go back to that guy we talked about earlier, Einstein. He won a Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect. You know what that means? The only way you can deliver light to different tissues in that tree or me is through the electrons that you collect. So, what's the difference between a tree and us fundamentally f

    yt/jtMu-KFyKxM-bitcoin-is-a-time-machine-with-dr-jack-kruse/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.772

    And there are theories called Grand Unified Theories which try to explain this, but certainly not part of any standard established theory, but it's key to everything we see in daily life because that's what makes the atom electrically neutral. Okay, now we can understand the quantization of charge, because charge is carried by these guys and these guys are either there or not there, so you can only have so many electrons. We cannot have a part of an electron, or part of a proton. Now, let's try to understand all these experiments in terms of what we know. First of all, when you take this piece

    yt/NK-BxowMIfg-1-electrostatics/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · _intake0.771

    **Non Geeks:** We essentially get electrons from foods, or at least I thought back then. We do this by moving those electrons over the inner mitochondrial membrane, and the result is in HEAT and ATP production. Since mammals generate energy backwards, compared to plants, this gave the me the idea to read Einstein’s equations backwards to gain insight on how life makes energy from chaos. By doing so, it changed my perspective about obesity almost immediately. **We are taught to think about obesity as excess calories. Yet when I reversed the equation it said obesity is a disease of a loss of ele

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/emf-2-einstein-meet-leptin.md

  10. 10 · _intake0.771

    All foods are electrons/protons, and all electrons are exactly the same in the universe, and can only be excited by light. Foods are supposed to be excited by sunlight, not artificial light. So the difference, we find in foods today is influenced by the frequencies of light they contain based upon how they were created. Nutrient density has different connotations to different people. When you consider the machinery of energy generation in a cell, this should narrow the discussion for people, but it has not. The input to mitochondria is called electron chain transport for a deep reason; moreove

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-12-adrenal-fatigue.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/