Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.941

   > fundamentally false okay it's a sacred cow you need to go after means that you need to understand really how mitochondria work because of this change more and that's

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated/mitochondria/020-fundamentally-false-okay-it-s-a-sacred-cow-you-need-to-go-af.md

2. 02 · _intake0.751

   Y - [`017-stop-looking-in-the-genome-and-i-need-to-learn-a-little-bit-`](mitochondria/017-stop-looking-in-the-genome-and-i-need-to-learn-a-little-bit-.md) — score=6 `00:10:57.079` — stop looking in the genome and I need to learn a little bit more about mitochondria because what is a mitoch Andria fund - [`018-on-the-ground-and-it-turns-out-because-there-s-a-wet-connect`](mitochondria/018-on-the-ground-and-it-turns-out-because-there-s-a-wet-connect.md) — score=6 `00:07:06.450` — on the ground and it turns out because there's a wet connection you actually gain free electrons for feet so if you r…

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated/INDEX.md

3. 03 · _intake0.716

   The other aspect I find fascinating is that the paleo dogma is trying to tell their followers what is or is not a good idea. How do you know if something is good when you do not understand how mitochondria work in people with chronically elevated cytokines? I don’t ascribe to the that line of thinking. In science or medicine, there is no authority who gets to decide what is or what is not a good idea. When someone usurps your ability to think, not much good follows, in my opinion.

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/tilted-quilt-random-musings-4.md

4. 04 · _intake0.714

   Jack Kruse: How to Bio-Hack Your](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-_DTk9hYvI&t=657) > stop looking in the genome and I need to learn a little bit more about mitochondria because what is a mitoch Andria fundamentally it's an environmental - **6** [must/because/fundamental] · `00:07:06.450` [Embracing Chaos with Dr Jack Kruse | TotalHealth TV](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp7Dm2NJgmg&t=426) > on the ground and it turns out because there's a wet connection you actually gain free electrons for feet so if you really understand fundamentally how mitochondria work you don't need to get - **6** [m…

   _intake/claims-allbranch/BY-CONCEPT.md

5. 05 · _intake0.706

   **ANALOGY TIME:** You’ve become a slab of granite. Think of pouring maple syrup on your granite counter top and leaving it there for twenty years and then trying to remove it. Got it? That is what happens in a blue-lit microwaved world to the inside of the gears in your mitochondria. You need to limit the environment of tech light and eat for biophysical hormony with the seasons not for the USDA pyramid or prevailing medical opinion. Fats are wiser than any other food but not for the reasons you think. Fats provide a form of hydrogen that is like DW-40 for the colony of your mitochondria. Make…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/what-is-biologic-concrete.md

6. 06 · blog0.706

   And he:- Place Citrine with his wife after the conjunction into the bath; do not kindle the bath excessively, lest they be deprived of sense and motion; cause them to remain in the bath until their body, and the colour thereof, shall become a certain unity, whereupon restore unto it the sweat thereof; again suffer it to die; then give it rest, and beware lest ye evaporate them by burning them in too strong a fire. Venerate the king and his wife, and do not burn them, since you know not when you may have need of these things, which improve the king and his wife. Cook them, therefore, until they…

   blog/www-sacred-texts-com/turba-philosophorum-part-2.md

7. 07 · blog0.700

   According to each premise, if a property belongs to an item or items specified in the antecedent, then it belongs to the item or items specified in the consequent. The argument using the property heap (Greek sôros ), from which the genus takes its name, is a good example. If one grain of sand is not a heap, then the result of adding one more grain is not a heap; if two grains are not a heap, then the result of adding one more is not a heap. But it is plain that if one repeats the operation by which these premises are generated often enough, the result will be a sequence of conditionals the con…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/carneades.md

8. 08 · blog0.699

   The reason is that in this syllogism, ‘man’ is an ampliative term, and “from an ampliated nondistributed term the same term does not follow nonampliated” that is, “in the minor proposition the term ‘man’ was ampliated to past [things], whereas in the conclusion it was not ampliated,” making the premises true but the conclusion false (S 5.3.2: 326; cf. QAnPr I.14). Similarly, terms referring to the divine persons sometimes generate counterexamples to the traditionally accepted modes. Thus, “the following syllogism in Barbara is invalid: ‘Every God is the son, every divine Father is God; therefo…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/john-buridan.md

9. 09 · blog0.698

   Let us consider all possible things as an “aggregate” ( jumlah) . This raises two assumptions: (1) the aggregate is self-caused, or (2) the aggregate is caused by an external cause (Avicenna, al-Najāt : 2: 89). Avicenna excludes the former assumption, explaining that the nature of what is possible in itself cannot change without a cause. Hence, an aggregate of possible things remains possible in itself; it must be caused by another cause to become necessary. Given that the series of causes and effects cannot progress ad infinitum , we must conclude that the existence of an aggregate of possibl…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/isaac-albalag.md

10. 10 · blog0.698

    (For a parallel discussion, see Posterior Analytics I 22.) On such an account, Aristotle is showing the opponent that if she wants to reject PNC she must pick out the same object and say that contradictory predicates apply, but if she does not mean anything definite by “human being”, for example, then she will be unable to pick out a subject of predication, for example, a human being, and say that contradictory predicates apply. Saying that an individual human being is a human being and not a human being, where the first means “two-footed animal” and the latter means something different is not…

    blog/plato-stanford-edu/aristotle-on-non-contradiction.md