bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

mitochondria

because guess what? The guy that controlled the budget, Anthony Fouchy, made sure we always focused in on RNA and DNA, not the mitochondrial DNA. That's why you never learned about UPES.
Concept
mitochondria
Score
8 · always · never · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.962

    > because guess what? The guy that controlled the budget, Anthony Fouchy, made sure we always focused in on RNA and DNA, not the mitochondrial DNA. That's why you never learned about UPES.

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/mitochondria/003-because-guess-what.md

  2. 02 · _intake0.747

    > need to understand the details of why and you're never really going to understand why we spend 99 of the NIH Budget on on studying nuclear DNA and not mitochondrial DNA because it was

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/mitochondria/005-need-to-understand-the-details-of-why-and-you-re-never-reall.md

  3. 03 · _intake0.746

    This should have been a big clue that DNA is not where the answer for wellness will be sowed. The universality of DNA is completely staggering across all species of life. I believe the reason we evolved the RNA/DNA protein mechanism universally across species is because it is the ultimate way biology can categorize the storage and processing of massive amounts of information from our environment.

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-epigenetics-7.md

  4. 04 · yt0.744

    And then he made the comment in 1999 that he said, I think this seems rather far-fetched based on what conventional centralized science was at that time. But he believed that it was conceivable that molecular biologists would have to eventually engineer a cell uh that could be sensitive to light to see if it in fact happened. Literally not even three four years after he made the comment um we had uh scientists actually starting to find out about optico genetics where actually light does change fiber type. So my answer to your question is there's no question that parents can do things but it's

    yt/sf9VNlTiq5s-neurosurgeon-talks-about-genetics-and-longevity-dr-jack-krus/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · _intake0.743

    Human ‘junk’ gene sequences can promote translation of proteins made by the DNA code. These translations are then modified in the endoplasmic reticulum which is directly linked to the mitochondrial energy sources. As energy levels drop it affects how protein side chains are added, subtracted, and altered. The neo-Darwinian paradigm cannot EXPLAIN these realities that destroy the cornerstones of Darwins version of evolution which has at its pillars of support: gradualism, materialism, and reductionism. The paradigm of neo-darwinianism cannot explain speciation in living, the rapidity at which i

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-23-dna-codes-quantum-evolution.md

  6. 06 · _intake0.742

    That's why you never understood this - **6** [always/never] · `00:23:39.280` [Red Light, Blue Light, Brain Damage: Dr. Jack Kruse Explains](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2njvFN-W4zc&t=1419) > made sure we always focused in on RNA and DNA, not the mitochondrial DNA. That's why you never learned about UPES. That's why you never understood this recursive light. I I when I sit down and - **6** [always/never] · `00:00:38.960` [Dr Jack Kruse | Counting Calories Doesn't Work!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V6D0GZbrAs&t=38) > like light water magnetism and mitochondrial medicine that doctors and

    _intake/canon-claims-raw/BY-CONCEPT.md

  7. 07 · _intake0.741

    And then when you think about the things that we now know that when we monitor - **7** [never/must/because] · `00:11:27.240` [Sunlight Is the Source of Life | Dr. Jack Kruse | EP 04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ClqKnD10p4&t=687) > need to understand the details of why and you're never really going to understand why we spend 99 of the NIH Budget on on studying nuclear DNA and not mitochondrial DNA because it was - **7** [never/causes/because] · `01:07:54.880` [Optimize Your Health in the Modern World with Dr. Jack Kruse](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYMUiOMkKMM&t=4074) > there is cause

    _intake/canon-claims-raw/BY-CONCEPT.md

  8. 08 · _intake0.739

    That's why you never understood this - **6** [always/never] · `00:23:39.280` [Red Light, Blue Light, Brain Damage: Dr. Jack Kruse Explains](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2njvFN-W4zc&t=1419) > made sure we always focused in on RNA and DNA, not the mitochondrial DNA. That's why you never learned about UPES. That's why you never understood this recursive light. I I when I sit down and - **6** [always/never] · `00:00:38.960` [Dr Jack Kruse | Counting Calories Doesn't Work!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V6D0GZbrAs&t=38) > like light water magnetism and mitochondrial medicine that doctors and

    _intake/claims-allbranch/BY-CONCEPT.md

  9. 09 · yt0.739

    And when you understand that this fits the modus operandi of Blue Light, which was the original MKUltra story, then it also fits the glyphosate story, which is the competitor inhibitor of melanin. Now you have the glucagon gene. They've had all three. The adrenal chrome is the other part of this. So that's where the story is. So sorry. This was a long discussion, but why do I have a problem with Peter Peters of Bitcoin. He had a big fucking podcast. He went out and told everybody he took a fucking job, okay. To travel, which is about the stupidest fucking thing anybody could do. Okay. But here

    yt/DAjTEOIH8Ww-sh-t-hitting-the-fan-is-coming-soon-bitcoiners-prepare-kruse/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · pubmed0.738

    The evolution of genetic material can be divided into at least three major phases: first, genomes of "nucleic acid-like" molecules; secondly, genomes of RNA; and finally, double-stranded DNA genomes such as those present in all contemporary cells. Using properties of nucleic acid molecules, we attempt to explain the evolutionary transition from RNA alone as a cellular informational macromolecule prior to the evolution of cell systems based on double-stranded DNA. The idea that ribonucleic acid-based cellular genomes preceded DNA is based on the following: (1) protein synthesis can occur in the

    pubmed/PMID-2464698-the-evolutionary-transition-from-rna-to-dna-in-early-cells/info.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/05-biophysics/