bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

ice age

uh wanted to talk to an ice cor specialist to make sure that my suspicions were right that they had never done any testing at all for metalurg in the ice age because I had
Concept
ice age
Score
5 · never · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · yt0.757

    So we've got a greater resolution now and I think that there's evidence that there might be a third meltwater spike in here. Um so then uh I'm going to taking it through um through the um the evidence that this is 1992. There's still no um impact hypothesis in '92. However, what you see happen large perturbations of ammonium and organic acids content in the summit Greenland ice core. So, this is some of the first results. So, the let me mention that the that the uh camp century and the die uh site uh are both near the margins of the ice sheet well of the Greenland ice sheet. So, at those margi

    yt/NWNjU-zFohs-new-discoveries-in-the-younger-dryas-impact-hypothesis/transcript.txt

  2. 02 · yt0.742

    Because the implication of the Firestone at Alaper is that it's largely going to be at least probably to a great extent explained the younger dus explained by the impact of objects into an ice sheet into an icy environment. Now that was in then just jumping ahead to 2007. Um the most famous paper was preceded by this one when they discovered micrometeorite impacts in bingi and mammoth tusks in the bison skull. And there's a lot about this on George Howard's uh cosmic tusk website. So I don't think we need to uh dive into that here. I think we'll skip past that and get right to the like it says

    yt/lfn6dvMkLqg-the-younger-dryas-heinrich-events-and-earth-s-sudden-meltdow/transcript.txt

  3. 03 · yt0.741

    What do modern archaeologists and geologists say when you present that to them? What do they what's their conclusion? What do they think about that? Well, uh, some of them say, well, there must have been some mistake. Yeah, we did it wrong or something, right? Yeah. You know, like, yeah, there there was a hoax. Yeah. Maybe some Indians brought these things into the mines. But you know, in when I was doing my research for forbidden archaeology, I got in touch with some historians in California who are very expert about that period of time and they said the Indians would not have gone anywhere n

    yt/aj8FypyKR3o-jsp-4-michael-cremo-did-man-live-with-dinosaurs-forbidden-ar/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.738

    With the publication of the Firestone at al paper in 2007, evidence for an extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megaponal extinctions and the younger dest cooling. We have made a major advance I believe towards some kind of resolution of the ice age conundrum. But we aren't there yet. uh the five authors of this new paper go on to elaborate upon the paradox right look at the name here rapid delaciation of eastern Maine okay what they're doing here is they're saying here uh the paradox is that well they're about to define the paradox okay um so it begins with conflic

    yt/lfn6dvMkLqg-the-younger-dryas-heinrich-events-and-earth-s-sudden-meltdow/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.735

    So that's what I had to do in that particular case because she wouldn't give me permission to use the actual photographs. Knowledge filtration, you see it happening all the time. Um Now, some Now Now the reports that I've given you up to this point have all been from scientific sources, from professional scientists, but I want to point out something else. And it's something you're you're familiar with, too. If something is there, if it's actually there in the world, it's we can't expect that it's just scientists who are going to be seeing it. You know, whether it's UFOs or uh strange archaeolo

    yt/sn3cPunQWpc-forbidden-archeology-by-michael-cremo-classic-90s-lecture-re/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.734

    they they they they seem to imagine that I am claiming that there was this giant advanced empire uh that existed during the ice age and I regard that as a fact. I don't claim that and I don't regard that as a fact. I think the past is an open mystery. I think there are so many messages that come down to us from the past which which invite us to consider possibilities other than those that have been considered by archaeologists. That's what I that's what I've wanted to pursue. And and I'm happy that readers have come along with me. But I'm not some kind of prophet, you know. I'm not claiming I'

    yt/0ttXsFarmwE-ancient-prophecies-pole-shifts-cosmic-cycles-lost-tech-pyram/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.734

    Now in that particular case you had some accusations of hoaxing because the the object was discovered during a well boring. People drill for water in that part of the country, Idaho the western states and at a depth of about 300 feet as you were mentioning they came up from the well boring with this object. Now there were are people who tried to offer a different explanation. They said, "Well, there must have been a fissure that went down to that level. And you know, there was some little artifact that had been made, some figurine that had been made by Indian tribes and it ended washed down th

    yt/pn7JOpDyCKM-michael-cremo-extreme-out-of-place-artifacts-more-forbidden-/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.732

    So that would be one possible response, to do something like that. And if you feel inspired to do it, then right on. This AUDIENCE: So you talked a lot regarding your critics throwing out the archaeological evidence based on it just being out of their paradigm, filtering it away, and so on. But some of the critics who've truly engaged your work, has it been just that, or do they have valid, scientific reasons why they're refuting your evidence? MICHAEL CREMO: Normally-- I mean, everybody's going to have to make up their own minds about these things. What I try to do in "Forbidden Archeology" w

    yt/DKfGC3P9KoQ-forbidden-archaeology-michael-cremo-talks-at-google/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.731

    My claim is that he doesn't he ignores most of the evidence for hunter gatherers in the ice age which is we have is that he ignores it or that he doesn't focus on it as much as he's focused on this ancient advanced civilization. I I mean I think that's one and the same. I think if you're going to look at the ice age, we need to look at the totality of evidence to understand what's there. Joe doesn't like what he's hearing about his boy here. Flint says Graham ignores archaeological data. There were hunter gatherers in the Ice Age. Archaeologists study them and know a lot about them. Graham doe

    yt/JK4Fo6m9C9M-the-great-big-pseudoarcheology-debunk-graham-hancock-dan-ric/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · _intake0.729

    Do ever wonder why they never won out in evolution against us? Modern science still struggles to figure out why? Could it be they could not become diabetic to survive the cold of the ancient past? After all we never find the Neanderthal skeletons in extreme Northern climates when the core ice samples show it was freezing cold? Coincidience or not? You decide.

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/cpc4-evolutionary-friend-or-foe.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/08-deep-history/