direct some one forms tensor two spinners all up on Y as the fermionic field content so that gets rid of the biggest problem because the internal symmetry group is what causes the
- Concept
- group theory
- Score
- 4 · causes · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · pubmed0.754
We conjecture that the leading two-derivative tree-level amplitudes for gluons and gravitons can be derived from gauge invariance together with mild assumptions on their singularity structure. Assuming locality (that the singularities are associated with the poles of cubic graphs), we prove that gauge invariance in just n-1 particles together with minimal power counting uniquely fixes the amplitude. Unitarity in the form of factorization then follows from locality and gauge invariance. We also give evidence for a stronger conjecture: assuming only that singularities occur when the sum of a sub…
pubmed/PMID-29932696-locality-and-unitarity-of-scattering-amplitudes-from-singula/info.md
- 02 · pubmed0.742
It is well known that a local, unitary Poincaré-invariant 2D quantum field theory with a global scaling symmetry and a discrete non-negative spectrum of scaling dimensions necessarily has both a left and a right local conformal symmetry. In this Letter, we consider a chiral situation beginning with only a left global scaling symmetry and do not assume Lorentz invariance. We find that a left conformal symmetry is still implied, while right translations are enhanced either to a right conformal symmetry or a left U(1) Kac-Moody symmetry.
pubmed/PMID-22107375-chiral-scale-and-conformal-invariance-in-2d-quantum-field-th/info.md
- 03 · yt0.742
And that's the next thorny issue. How do you deal with subsystems in quantum mechanics and so on? And we now believe to have cracked at least two of the three most prominent problems. How does this work? What is actually flowing there? How do you actually get this onto the street formally? And also, how do you deal with composed systems? Because quantum systems famously compose by tensor products. So the Hilbert space of a composite system is the tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of what we think are the con…
yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt
- 04 · openalex-fanout0.742
- (1998) **Anti de Sitter space and holography** — Edward Witten — cited 13269x - (2008) **Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation** — Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon — cited 6868x - (2000) **Large N field theories, string theory and gravity** — Ofer Aharony, Steven S. Gubser — cited 5566x - (2006) **Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond** — Alexei Kitaev — cited 5288x - (2000) **Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quan** — N. Read, Dmitry Green — cited 3492x - (2008) **Classification of topolog…
openalex-fanout/W2007185418-quantum-field-theory-and-the-jones-polynomial/info.md
- 05 · pubmed0.741
A key obstruction to the twistor programme has been its so-called 'googly problem', unresolved for nearly 40 years, which asks for a twistor description of right-handed interacting massless fields (positive helicity), using the same twistor conventions that give rise to left-handed fields (negative helicity) in the standard 'nonlinear graviton' and Ward constructions. An explicit proposal for resolving this obstruction--palatial twistor theory--is put forward (illustrated in the case of gravitation). This incorporates the concept of a non-commutative holomorphic quantized twistor 'Heisenberg a…
pubmed/PMID-26124255-palatial-twistor-theory-and-the-twistor-googly-problem/info.md
- 06 · openalex0.740
The Role of Goldstone Bosons** (1969) — cited 166x · https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.184.1750 - **Change of variables and equivalence theorems in quantum field theories** (1961) — cited 164x · https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(61)91075-6 - **Overlapping Divergences and the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:** (1951) — cited 162x · https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.82.217 - **Unitary representations of super-gauge symmetries** (1974) — cited 160x · https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90500-8
openalex/A5101859682/info.md
- 07 · yt0.738
Oh, I was saying, okay, so in the principal polynomial, I can imagine that there's a lot of theoretical considerations. I can imagine how you can get symmetry or anti-symmetry conditions. I can imagine how you can get signature. I can imagine how you get that it is non-degenerate or that is degenerate. But I don't see how you get compatibility with connection as a condition of the principal polynomial. But there's no connection at all. So, okay, what we call signature in the metric, if I look at it from t…
yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt
- 08 · _intake0.737
> thing. And it really is spin six cross spin four because GU, and I don't know that you've, you and I have even had this discussion is a machine that could also accept a one 11 spacetime or a one 15, any multiple of four dimensions with one of them taken as time results in a GU. Why would a one 11 work? Sorry, did I say one 11? I meant. Seven 11. Seven 11. I meant one seven. No, no, I'm messing you up now. One 11. Yeah. No, why? Because it has to add up to. Well, 12 is a multiple of four.
_intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/relativity/003-thing.md
- 09 · openalex-fanout0.736
(1998) Anti de Sitter space and holography — cited 13269x (2008) Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation — cited 6868x (2000) Large N field theories, string theory and gravity — cited 5566x (2006) Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond — cited 5288x (2000) Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect — cited 3492x (2008) Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions — cited 3342x (1991) Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect — cit…
openalex-fanout/W2007185418-quantum-field-theory-and-the-jones-polynomial/info.md
- 10 · pubmed0.736
Motivated by the problem of identifying Majorana mode operators at junctions, we analyze a basic algebraic structure leading to a doubled spectrum. For general (nonlinear) interactions the emergent mode creation operator is highly nonlinear in the original effective mode operators, and therefore also in the underlying electron creation and destruction operators. This phenomenon could open up new possibilities for controlled dynamical manipulation of the modes. We briefly compare and contrast related issues in the Pfaffian quantum Hall state.
pubmed/PMID-24329461-algebra-of-majorana-doubling/info.md
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/01-mathematics/