Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.959

   > truly what Einstein means in terms of medicine that correlation is the key then you begin to realize there is no correct answer and there is no real truth why because the truth is subject

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/einstein/010-truly-what-einstein-means-in-terms-of-medicine-that-correlat.md

2. 02 · _intake0.790

   **Ultimate Truth Bomb:** When you uncover the foundational principles of nature, you are not subject to correlation or causation. Today, modern medicine is basing everything it believes on the standard built into the randomized controlled clinical trial. Biology is based on the interaction of solar radiations on matter. My blog is suggesting that maybe we are looking at the world of biology incorrectly, and we need to look at our modern medical problems the way Einstein did. They believe an RCT is the foundation of the biological sciences to get our best answers. I no longer do. I think when w…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/quantum-biology-7-vitamin-d.md

3. 03 · blog0.755

   We are now able to distinguish the enduring thing-substance, on the one side, from its variable manifestations from different points of view and on different occasions, on the other, and we thereby arrive at a new fundamental distinction between appearance and reality. This distinction is then expressed in its most developed form, for Cassirer, in the linguistic notion of propositional truth and thus in the propositional copula. Here the Kantian “categories” of space, time, substance, and causality take on a distinctively intuitive or “presentational” configuration. The distinction between app…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/ernst-cassirer.md

4. 04 · yt0.745

   With certainty. Now, this is a criterion, I don't know what you call it, a a dictum I call it, by Einstein. Einstein was worried about this concept of quantum reality, I think. And he and lots of other people were worried about this. To what extent is the quantum state real? Is it a real thing? Or is it just a figment of imagination or useful tool of a our calculations? Is it real? Not that it's real in the sense of real numbers, cuz it's not. It's complex numbers, which is a nice sort of um iron irony. But take the spin case, that's a good one. Which way is it spinning? Like you know, not sur…

   yt/vC4HNcqTQXk-roger-penrose-on-mind-consciousness-closer-to-truth-chats/transcript.txt

5. 05 · yt0.743

   >> And and the thing >> I know Hilbert because it's Hilbert Space. Hbert Space. >> Tell me about that in a minute. But in this particular story, Einstein had visited Hilbert in June of 1915, showed him everything that he'd worked out for 10 years. Then Hilbert took it the final step and published before him. In the end of the day, Hilbert said, "No, no, it's your theory. It's your theory, Albert. I I'm not trying to take it from you." But he did publish a little before him. >> Even though he would not have published had Einstein not visited him. >> Yeah. He wouldn…

   yt/NxMMd5kMu7o-exploring-hidden-dimensions-with-brian-greene/transcript.txt

6. 06 · _intake0.742

   - **Albert <<Einstein>> E=Mc²** - `archive/AlbertEinsteinEMc … - **photoelectric-biology** - `_intake/concept-digests/photoelectric-biology.md` - … <<einstein>>-albert.md` - … Even time is <<<<relative>>>> according to <<<<Einstein>>>> and now you might be understanding why. It is also critical in constructing … - **<<<<photoelectric>> … - **TIME #7: THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT** - `_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-7-photoelectric-effect.md` - … proving <<Einstein>> correct. <<Einstein>> actually won the Nobel Prize for his work on the <<photoelectric>> effect and not for the Theory of <<R…

   _intake/canon-profiles/einstein-albert.md

7. 07 · yt0.742

   Actually, Schrödinger did that,&nbsp;&nbsp; right? Schrödinger had a modified idea. Again,&nbsp; Schrödinger had an idea of modified gravity.&nbsp;&nbsp; And he said, “no, no, no, no. Einstein does&nbsp; these non-symmetric metrics. But actually,&nbsp;&nbsp; a deeper structural concept than the&nbsp; metric is the connection.” And there&nbsp;&nbsp; are connections that come from a metric, and&nbsp; they're more general connections, right? So,&nbsp;&nbsp; that was Schrödinger's idea. Actually, a wonderful&nbsp; book by Schrödinger, Space-Time Structure.&nbsp;&nbsp; A very beautiful, thin book o…

   yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

8. 08 · blog0.739

   It is here that contextual matters enter in. For, in general, there can be different—though, importantly, non-competing —accounts of “the cause” of a given thing, event or phenomenon. And now we have an argument for EC: attributing “knowledge” involves giving credit; credit attributions involve a kind of causal explanation; but causal explanations require a contextualist semantics; so “knowledge” attributions require a contextualist semantics too (2009, 107). As the discussion of this section reveals, there is plenty of room for variety among forms of EC—both about, in Jonathan Schaffer’s (200…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/epistemic-contextualism.md

9. 09 · blog0.736

   (Note that all footnotes are substantive, but inessential to an initial reading, and are accessed in a separate file by clicking on the bracketed superscript. The mention vs. use of a term will be indicated either by quotation marks or italics, depending upon which is most easily readable in the context.) 1. The Intuitive Distinction 1.1 Kant 1.2 Frege 2. High Hopes 2.1 Mathematics 2.2 Science and Beyond 3. Problems with the Distinction 3.1 The Paradox of Analysis 3.2 Problems with Logicism 3.3 Convention? 3.4 Verificationism and Confirmation Holism 3.5 Quine on Meaning in Linguistics 3.6 Expl…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/the-analytic-synthetic-distinction.md

10. 10 · yt0.735

    This flips the script on neuroscience, philosophy, even technology. Because if meaning can't be measured or shared in the traditional sense, then no machine, no matter how powerful, can replicate what it's like to be you. This isn't just about consciousness. It's about reality itself. Cuz when you realize that the universe doesn't contain meaning, but that you're the source of it, then suddenly you're not a passenger in this world. You're a creator. We like to think of the world as something out there, separate from us, something we can study, manipulate, even control. But this idea rests on a…

    yt/usDVuyx0Myc-they-will-break-your-understanding-of-everything/transcript.txt