Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · yt0.735

   You know the sity when he he knew itself that way. Same way. M >> in other words any new knowing is a creation is not a combination of stuff is a new creation. >> That's where creation comes from. >> Yeah. And and and sort of physics the the metaphor physics gives us is the collapse of the wave function. >> Yeah. >> Because that's potentiality and when we want to gain knowledge we have to collapse and then we have a particle. >> Yeah. That but that is you see the crucial thing is that knowing is about meaning. is not about symbols. >> We so far I haven…

   yt/cXlxCOoNZ7E-spacetime-is-the-memory-of-a-self-knowing-universe-federico-/transcript.txt

2. 02 · _intake0.734

   I told a friend parts of this story in a phone call in 2011, and told him when I was done with all this that I would leave no doubt in any one’s mind with what I found and why it altered my perception. I told him about [Factor X](https://jackkruse.com/may-2012-webinar/), hoping he would see the was a bigger evolutionary story I was painting for people to see. He explained that it might upset the ‘apple cart’ and I should expect some backlash. I told him that people interested in ancestral living should be more interested in the truth of how our biology really works than what they believe. Mart…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/emf-3-the-origin-of-life.md

3. 03 · yt0.732

   Just to give you some sense of the kinds of evidence that Kihlstrom drew upon in writing this review article and coming to the conclusions, which are sort of alluded to in the title, in one study research participants are shown in the vajra paradigm called, an instrument called the tachistoscope, which flashes visual information so briefly for so few milliseconds that you don't even know you've seen anything at all, let alone what you've seen. In this experiment, the participants were shown two faces. Face A, under which was written the word rapist and face B, under which was written the word …

   yt/CmuYrnOVmfk-the-source-of-consciousness-with-mark-solms/transcript.txt

4. 04 · blog0.729

   Whereas, if we take John and Mary’s stricter standard to be too demanding—if their denial of “knowledge” to Smith is false—then, not only must we reject the feeling that what they are saying is in some sense correct, but it is “hard to see how Mary and John should describe their situation”: Certainly they are being prudent in refusing to rely on the itinerary. They have a very important meeting in Chicago. Yet if Smith knows on the basis of the itinerary that the flight stops in Chicago, what should they have said? ‘Okay, Smith knows that the flight stops in Chicago, but still, we need to chec…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/epistemic-contextualism.md

5. 05 · _intake0.728

   **Truth Bomb #2:** It may help some of you realize why “your path has no clear destination and you get annoyed with the constant revisions that you must endure.” Modern life is subjugating your design because you are unaware of how something so beneficial to your quality life is sucking the life and electrons right out of your mitochondria and your telomeres as you read this.

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/emf-1-does-your-rolex-work.md

6. 06 · _intake0.727

   “It was claimed” is suitably cautious. I’d not be surprised if this were true, however. The rest of the article ought to disturb people’s complacency, too, but I’m not sure it will.

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/organizational-structural-failure-7-autophagy-fail.md

7. 07 · blog0.726

   Just a slight strengthening of the stated assumptions results in even higher levels of nested knowledge. Suppose the waiter and the guest each know that the other can infer what he infers from the waiter’s announcement. Can the guest now believe that the waiter does not know that she knows that he knows he is at fault? If the guest considers this question, she reasons that if the waiter falsely believes it is possible that she does not know that he knows he is at fault, then the waiter must believe it to be possible that she cannot infer that he knows he is at fault from his own declaration. S…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/common-knowledge.md

8. 08 · yt0.725

   Brian: Yeah, I can imagine. Kip: His   apology and Oppenheimer didn't... And so it was a  momentous moment in the history of science that,   of miscommunication between these two great men. Brian: And was   it an arrogance on Oppenheimer's or just a- Kip: No, no. Brian: ...feeling bad? Kip: I don't think so. Brian: Or what do you think the emotion was? Kip: I think he   was just ... I don't know. I didn't know. I  knew Wheeler better than I knew Oppenheimer.   Certainly Oppenheimer is capable of arrogance,  but I don't think so. …

   yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

9. 09 · blog0.724

   When we see a text version of the Gettysburg Address, that text says mind to us in a way totally unrelated to any induction or analogy from past encounters with written texts. It was that type of testimony to mind, to design, that some historical advocates of design arguments believed that they found in some R s observed in nature—a testimony having no dependency on induction or analogy. Beauty, purpose and in general value especially when conjoined with delicate complexity were popular underlying intuitive marks. Intricate, dynamic, stable, functioning order of the sort we encounter in nature…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/teleological-arguments-for-god-s-existence.md

10. 10 · yt0.724

    The reward. Information. Is being corrupted. In science. For us, for me. For you, information is the meaning of a symbol. The symbol is a carrier of meaning, and the meaning is not a property of the brain. Or the physical brain. The meaning is a property of the field, something that we have within we. In fact, we had we had to have is what is carried by. Qualia, by an experience, by. An inner experience. So meaning is the foundational. Aspect is the ultimate ontology of reality, because. Meaning is what one is seeking to know itself. Meaning is the essence of its own self. Knowing the essence …

    yt/w6cBQESNDV0-federico-faggin-merging-science-spirituality-quantum-physics/transcript.txt