bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

becker

because that's the best way to get back to Becker's current to rejumpstart the program to fix what didn't finish in nurilation. Because when you do that, we don't need to screw around with that
Concept
becker
Score
4 · must · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · yt0.734

    So the real issue is what happens if you lose control of oxygen in the phalamus during nurilation? Could that lead to autism? The answer is yes. Could that lead to just about every other disease where it happens like you said? Where's the weakest link in the program? And is that true also post-natally? The answer is yes. So once you begin to understand how the process works and how we regenerate post-natally when the umbilical cords cut the ductus arteriosis closes off, the regeneration program is radically different in modern adults than it is in babies. That's when you have to use an oxygena

    yt/2njvFN-W4zc-red-light-blue-light-brain-damage-dr-jack-kruse-explains-wtf/transcript.txt

  2. 02 · _intake0.727

    In fact, it does not use ATP hydrolysis as its main action. This should have made biology ask better questions back then, but they did not. In fact, when this was published in the late 1960’s, no one paid much attention to it because the biologic community was not ready for the thought of semiconduction. The idea of diodes in living bone seemed completely ridiculous. Maybe that is why so many in the paleosphere cannot believe what I am currently pointing out in this very series too? Most people who heard about Becker’s work ignored it because it seemed so far-fetched. Becker and Bassett actual

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/emf-8-quantum-bone.md

  3. 03 · _intake0.727

    This sounded hard to fathom when you first read it, I’d imagine. Today’s blog is filling in the details of precisely how this happens in everyone of you. Why has no one connected these dots until now? **The reason is in how poorly Becker’s research described his own work in the literature of 50 years ago. ** In his reports they confused the negative potentials found in a salamander’s DC current of injury when he amputated their legs in experiments in his work on limb regeneration, with the negative potentials that actually stimulated bone growth regeneration naturally when the bone was broken.

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/emf-7-quantum-prometheus.md

  4. 04 · _intake0.723

    He was dramatically influenced by Albert Szent Gyorgyi, who became a Nobel Laureate for discovering vitamin C. He was the first scientist to publicly say he believed that all of biology used semiconduction to animate life. In fact, Szent Gyorgyi’s on March 21, 1941, gave a speech to the Budapest Academy when we mentioned that he felt electricity had to be part of life’s magic, but he believed it was semiconduction that was the key missing piece. Becker took the implications of that speech, and in 20 years, proved Szent Gyorgyi correct with his work in human bone regeneration. Most people in th

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-epigenetics-9-quantum-sleep.md

  5. 05 · blog0.717

    It’s called Conditionalization and it says that, if you assign positive credence to a proposition \(E\) and then learn \(E\) for sure as evidence, then your new credence in a proposition \(X\) should be your old conditional credence in \(X\) given \(E\), where that is defined to be the ratio of your credence in the conjunction of \(X\) and \(E\) to your credence in \(E\) alone; or, in other words, it’s the proportion of your old credence in \(E\) that you also assigned to \(X\). So you might think that (i) you should set your original credences by maximising expected utility with respect to yo

    blog/plato-stanford-edu/epistemic-utility-arguments-for-epistemic-norms.md

  6. 06 · _intake0.714

    In these experiments**, he proved how anesthesia works mechanistically and how sleep and wakefulness happen globally.** The problem was, he did not realize what he found back then. Why? Because many other discoveries had yet to have been made to allow him to understand the data back then. I realized the brilliance of his work immediately when I read it in 2008. Let us see first what Gerard did to make sense of what Becker did.

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-epigenetics-9-quantum-sleep.md

  7. 07 · _intake0.714

    Becker knew medicine was trying to cut ties with “electricity and vitalism theories” in the 1940-50s. He knew intuitively that biology was wrong to condemn a theory that clearly had had a strong experimental foundation in Gerard and Berger’s work. He thought these findings by Gerard might explain how humans heal wounds and regenerate all their tissues. Tissue regeneration and bone regeneration is what made Dr. Becker famous in the next 20 years. This is how I learned about his work in bone physiology as a spine surgeon.

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-epigenetics-9-quantum-sleep.md

  8. 08 · _intake0.714

    The coordination of the current on your semiconductors is equivalent to the discipline of your actions. You saw above that a sustained current only exists if all the particles are moving in the same direction. This direction must be congruent to direction needed in the system. Becker’s bone work showed that we use the photoelectric effect on collagen to calcify bone. I spoke about this in a bit in [EMF 7](https://jackkruse.com/quantum-biology-7-vitamin-d/), but expanded upon it to a great degree in [EMF 8](https://jackkruse.com/emf-8-quantum-bone/). Today, I am going to scale it to the macro w

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/quantum-biology-8-quantum-scaling.md

  9. 09 · yt0.712

    To to be successful is not necessary. Well, and and as you pointed out very early in this discussion, it also might be hyper expensive, right? You actually don't want to know more about something than you need to know in order to perform the requisite action. That's part of efficiency. Right. So, okay. So, all right. So, let let's leave that aside. Let me Let me I'll I'll I'll grind away on that in I'll just say one little If you have a like a a desktop folder on your on your laptop and for a file and and it's blue and rectangular in the middle of your screen, well, the file is not blue. It's

    yt/SPnyxnvU4ko-is-reality-an-illusion-dr-donald-hoffman-ep-387/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · _intake0.711

    - **Disconnecting one side of Dr. Becker's regenerative circuit.** - `yt/7LHwUIv5zOo-disconnecting-one-side-of-dr-becker-s-regenerative-circuit/transcript.txt` - … tip I like to tell people that earthing is the simplest <<Tesla>> circuit his his single wire circuit that he made himself you know …

    _intake/canon-profiles/tesla-nikola.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/05-biophysics/