bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

atlantis

impact events? >> See, this this always makes me laugh because the archaeologists say, "Oh, there's no evidence of a lost civilization anywhere." And but they've
Concept
atlantis
Score
5 · always · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · yt0.833

    Would would you believe would you would you have a a a feeling that they are recovery outlets for people that have survived these impact events? >> See, this this always makes me laugh because the archaeologists say, "Oh, there's no evidence of a lost civilization anywhere." And but they've just they've discovered all these sites dating to exactly when they're supposed to be dated, right? So 20 years ago, they didn't know and they would have said these things don't exist, but now they do. And there's good evidence that go back is much older than they've dated it to. Right. >> Yeah.

    yt/sQAaqzcEXrM-mark-young-on-the-younger-dryas-impact-cosmic-catastrophe-lo/transcript.txt

  2. 02 · yt0.805

    What do modern archaeologists and geologists say when you present that to them? What do they what's their conclusion? What do they think about that? Well, uh, some of them say, well, there must have been some mistake. Yeah, we did it wrong or something, right? Yeah. You know, like, yeah, there there was a hoax. Yeah. Maybe some Indians brought these things into the mines. But you know, in when I was doing my research for forbidden archaeology, I got in touch with some historians in California who are very expert about that period of time and they said the Indians would not have gone anywhere n

    yt/aj8FypyKR3o-jsp-4-michael-cremo-did-man-live-with-dinosaurs-forbidden-ar/transcript.txt

  3. 03 · yt0.789

    Now in that particular case you had some accusations of hoaxing because the the object was discovered during a well boring. People drill for water in that part of the country, Idaho the western states and at a depth of about 300 feet as you were mentioning they came up from the well boring with this object. Now there were are people who tried to offer a different explanation. They said, "Well, there must have been a fissure that went down to that level. And you know, there was some little artifact that had been made, some figurine that had been made by Indian tribes and it ended washed down th

    yt/pn7JOpDyCKM-michael-cremo-extreme-out-of-place-artifacts-more-forbidden-/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · blog0.784

    For instance, "...a collection of objects excavated from Tiahuanaca, in Central America." He misspells Tiahuanaco, and it's in South America. Or how about "...engraved with a sentence in Phoenician hieroglyphics". The Phoenicians used a phonetic writing system, not hieroglyphs. And "the Egyptian and the American pyramids [were] covered with a thick coating of smooth and shining cement", which is completely untrue. Some of the Egyptian pyramids were originally covered with casing stones; none of the American pyramids were encased, let alone with cement. And "In the records of the old Buddhistic

    blog/www-sacred-texts-com/how-i-found-the-lost-atlantis-the-source-of-all-civilization.md

  5. 05 · yt0.782

    So that would be one possible response, to do something like that. And if you feel inspired to do it, then right on. This AUDIENCE: So you talked a lot regarding your critics throwing out the archaeological evidence based on it just being out of their paradigm, filtering it away, and so on. But some of the critics who've truly engaged your work, has it been just that, or do they have valid, scientific reasons why they're refuting your evidence? MICHAEL CREMO: Normally-- I mean, everybody's going to have to make up their own minds about these things. What I try to do in "Forbidden Archeology" w

    yt/DKfGC3P9KoQ-forbidden-archaeology-michael-cremo-talks-at-google/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.781

    The debate is 4 and a half hours long, so we're not going to go through every last moment. But given that this is the centerpiece of this fiasco, we do need to spend a good amount of time here. So, let's dive into it. I'm here to try to discuss with Graham um and to test his lost civilization hypothesis. He has this he's written about it many books and he's uh given many talks here and on Netflix and he's talked about this idea of a lost advanced civilization from the ice age and advanced civilization that's around the globe right and in particular he thinks there was a glo a global cataclysm

    yt/JK4Fo6m9C9M-the-great-big-pseudoarcheology-debunk-graham-hancock-dan-ric/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.779

    So instead of starting off by responding to Flint's lines of evidence against his madeup civilization or providing any evidence for civilization whatsoever, Graham goes on a rant about how mean archaeologists are. That's fitting. By Clovis first, he's talking about the idea that the so-called Clovis culture were the first people to inhabit the Americas, something which was gradually challenged and more or less overturned by new information several decades ago, which Flint acknowledged just before this clip. Graham is whining about how one archaeologist did some stuff and other archaeologists w

    yt/JK4Fo6m9C9M-the-great-big-pseudoarcheology-debunk-graham-hancock-dan-ric/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.779

    I just wanted to end by saying look you know archaeologists we what we find is what we publish right we are not trying to keep stuff hidden if I found Atlantis I would publish Atlantis Claus Schmidt found Gobecletepe he published Gobecletepe and so I think that that's really important we want to change and rewrite history that's how we make a name for ourselves every article I have published and most of my colleagues have published is something that is adding and changing our picture of the past we're not locked in on a specific narrative. What we're trying to do is update the picture of the p

    yt/JK4Fo6m9C9M-the-great-big-pseudoarcheology-debunk-graham-hancock-dan-ric/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.777

    [Music] The recent history of the Earth and its human population is far more complex than many have supposed with ever more freshly unearthed evidence of catastrophic upheavalss in our near past. The question we must ask is, were our ancestors vulnerable to these catastrophic events? And if so, are there implications for the survival of our modern civilization? Modern humanity has been around for a long time. several hundred thousands of years in fact. How is it that only in the last few centuries we have built an advanced civilization? Are we the first to achieve such a goal? Is there a reaso

    yt/9Cp1byluSUU-what-really-happened-during-the-younger-dryas/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · yt0.777

    However, as it mentioned here, they're very they're rare amongst meteorites which may have some interesting implications that we don't have time to discuss here for this episode. Okay. So going further into the evidence for an effect on the Hopwell culture. Now remember the Hopeal culture, in case you don't know, they're the ones who are associated with all the monumental earthworks and mound building structures throughout the the the Ohio River Valley and its tributaries, which is something we're going to be talking about in great detail in upcoming episodes. Not just the the association pote

    yt/skMH6ihjVqg-hyper-velocity-impacts-and-human-civilization-cosmic-encount/transcript.txt

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/08-deep-history/