Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · yt0.798

   The standard model the our best theory of um uh the interactions of elementary particles and fields today. Uh and they give predictions that are correct to gosh Sean what's the latest what's the longest number of decimal places that we have predictions? >> It's double digits right like you know it's it's more than 10 dec decimal places. So, it's very good. >> In the high energy theory area here at Harvard, there's a glass uh door that has um I believe if I'm remembering correctly, it's the gyroagnetic ratio of the electron. It's the theoretical prediction and the experimental predi…

   yt/gINYis8BgSY-mindscape-323-jacob-barandes-on-indivisible-stochastic-quant/transcript.txt

2. 02 · yt0.772

   Not only do we know what the theory says, we know how far we can extend it before it should fail. Let me just give you one slides worth of argument in favor of this. There's a feature of quantum field theory called crossing symmetry. And I'm going to explain to you what this means. This picture we have here is called a Fineman diagram. My claim to fame in the physics community is that I sit at the desk that Richard Fineman used to sit at at Caltech. Yes. Thank you. The rule is that Fineman's old desk goes to the most senior theoretical physicist at Caltech who is not senior enough to get a bra…

   yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt

3. 03 · yt0.768

   It's just the model. The point is, we are prepared for something that  hasn't happened yet, right? If somebody sees   matter that cannot have due to their behavior  a Lorentzian background but you would then,   phenomenologists would pretty quickly figure out  what may be the simplest background that could do   that, then the question comes up, but what's the  action for that background? It can't be Einstein,   right? Einstein is for a Lorentzian metric  or a metric in general. But then you would   try to solve our equa…

   yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

4. 04 · _intake0.764

   Physicists used E=mc2 to build the CERN collider and many other particle accelerators to understand the nuclear reactions in quantum physics. They built machines capable of aiming high energy protons into a target. This alone is capable of creating matter out of the energy they put into the machine in a controlled fashion. The matter they created were particles that they used to construct the theory called the Standard Model of physics. Every particle known to date in the Standard Model theory has been found using this detection system. The identity of these particles also required a lot of co…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-7-photoelectric-effect.md

5. 05 · yt0.763

   I mean, general  relativity couldn't be right, right? I mean,   it builds with Lorentzian metric that this  is just not possible. But if then, again,   I'm not saying I could then immediately say  how the gravity theory looks like. But if some   phenomenologist makes a really good model for this  matter, now, so say, standard model grade model,   right? So we incorporated the standard model,  let's fantasize. And then we have a standard   model with faster than speed of light neutrinos.  Say, okay, say. Then I woul…

   yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

6. 06 · yt0.763

   They're differential equations that tell us what happened. There's conservation of information. It's a wholly different story in the macroscopic world of the manifest image. There's a difference between past and future. There is cause and effect. It is true that I need to push the bottle to keep it moving. There are reasons why things happen in the macroscopic world. So, how do we connect these different levels? That's the difficult part. The that equation I showed you, the core theory equation, that's the easy part. Okay, this is the hard part. That's why we're not done with it yet. So, let m…

   yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt

7. 07 · yt0.763

   If you poke the Higs field, it starts vibrating and you see a little particle called the Higs Bzon. We first successfully did that in 2012. Big news. Uh in Geneva, the Large Hydron Collider, we discovered the Higs Bzon. There are other particles that exist that we know about, but they're just heavier cousins of these particles. So there's not only an electron, there's also a muon and a tow. There's not only an up quark, there's a charm quark and a top quark, etc. All those heavier particles, if you made one right here, it would decay away in an instant. It would make these particles. So the cl…

   yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt

8. 08 · yt0.762

   Brian: Now, one thing in   that book, which is interesting to me is  that when physicists typically learn the   mathematical methods of general relativity,  differential geometry to be concrete,   most physicists learn it in a so called  coordinate form, which is the more nuts and   bolts ingredients necessary to really carry out  certain kinds of calculations. You're at great   pains in that book to do both the coordinate  version, and the coordinate-free version,   which is perhaps maybe the way more mathema…

   yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

9. 09 · yt0.760

   Prof: All right, today's topic is the theory of nearly everything, okay? You wanted to know the theory of everything? You're almost there, because I'm finally ready to reveal to you the laws of quantum dynamics that tells you how things change with time. So that's the analog of F = ma. That's called the Schrˆdinger equation, and just about anything you see in this room, or on this planet, anything you can see or use is really described by this equation I'm going to write down today. It contains Newton's laws as part of it, because if you can do the quantum theory, you can always find hidden in…

   yt/Iy6RspNw80E-24-quantum-mechanics-vi-time-dependent-schr-dinger-equation/transcript.txt

10. 10 · yt0.759

    So science is perfectly okay to not explain the what and the wise in terms of what things are and why they do what they do. That's not for science. Science is about what will happen next. What are we going to see next? That's what the method the science scientific method allows us to do. Um so it's legitimate that science doesn't say what things are. It doesn't need to. It it it can't and it's there is that's not what its value is all about. Its value is about predicting behavior. But materialism is not science. Materialism is a metaphysics and as such it is a statement about what things are. …

    yt/DrMEL20o5KE-why-materialism-is-complete-nonsense-bernardo-kastrup/transcript.txt