Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · yt0.765

   So isn't it basically hiding within it, all of the weirdnesses that we sort of have a more blatant in-our-face description of in the Schrodinger approach? - Well, the two approaches are equivalent. It's just that one of them makes it easier to get the results of an experiment, and the other one makes it easier to get how the result comes about. So in practice, I use both, and I still use both, in practice, even though I advocate only the Heisenberg picture for understanding quantum theory. One of the advantages of trying to find out how the observed phenomena come about, is not only that we wa…

   yt/Af5LICjFIBc-what-is-quantum-mechanics-really-telling-us-world-science-fe/transcript.txt

2. 02 · yt0.764

   I think that the Schrodinger picture, which is the one that uses the wave function as a probability wave and the probability of one thing happening rather than another, that is a, I think, a misleading way of expressing the theory, though it does express the theory correctly and fully, but it's misleading in that it doesn't include an account of how the outcome comes about. So I favor using the Heisenberg picture, which is the other way around. It takes as fundamental, the observables of a physical system, exactly like classical physics does. And the state is a constant, therefore it doesn't, …

   yt/Af5LICjFIBc-what-is-quantum-mechanics-really-telling-us-world-science-fe/transcript.txt

3. 03 · yt0.760

   Um when we learn all of us learn to begin, we talk about the wave function of just a single particle. And in a way that's nice because you can if we go back to visualizing it, you can kind of visualize it. Um because just mathematically like a electric field or a magnetic field the wave function for a single particle is represented by a single number associated with every point in space. It's a complex number. So that's a little tricky but okay it's a it's a number. You can sort of say oh there's the wave function is is there's more of it here than here right and compare how much or the square…

   yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt

4. 04 · yt0.760

   If you look at them from one special frame of reference, when this is gone and you say that one is the whole state. When this one's gone, this one is the whole state. But it's got to do that simultaneously. Simultaneous doesn't mean anything relativistically. What means something? Well, does it go back? I mean, maybe when this is gone Anyway, it doesn't make sense. The only way to make it make sense is that it goes way back to where they separated. And then in a certain sense, it already knew which one was going to go. That doesn't make much sense, either. But in this article, I tried to devel…

   yt/vC4HNcqTQXk-roger-penrose-on-mind-consciousness-closer-to-truth-chats/transcript.txt

5. 05 · yt0.760

   I think I'm afraid I'm thinking that I have a very different view of the ones expressed by the other two or. Yeah, I mean, my view certainly is not that it's quantum mechanics because quantum mechanics, as we currently understand it, is well, as Einstein and Schrödinger have said about it, it's an incomplete theory. I'm not as polite as they are, they were saying it's incomplete. I would say it's actually not even quite correct and is not correct because quantum mechanics as it currently exists does not have a theory of the collapse of the wave function. You see, you have standard quantum mech…

   yt/0nOtLj8UYCw-quantum-consciousness-debate-does-the-wave-function-actually/transcript.txt

6. 06 · yt0.756

   But nevertheless, every term here is explained, briefly. It takes a year long quantum field theory course in graduate school to get the details, but at least say what every term means, including the i for example and including the k less than lambda. What you don't see are causes, purposes, or reasons why. It's just Laplacian calculation over and over again. This is the modern version of what you need to program into Laplace's demon so that starting from the position and configuration of the world at one point, it can find out what will happen next or what happened before. The final criterion …

   yt/x26a-ztpQs8-the-big-picture-sean-carroll-talks-at-google/transcript.txt

7. 07 · yt0.753

   I mean you you you have a certain range of of of statements that you're talking about and within that category of statements everything is either true or false and all physicists agree that this calculation uh is should be done in this way and uh there's not any ambiguities. So this goes against it doesn't exactly go against but all of these things have been said uh where you equate true and false and say they're both true is not part of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is just the opposite. Everything is that you deal with is either true or false. And u so how does quantum theory then put…

   yt/v73S4BkItrc-panel-quantum-theory-and-free-will-chris-fields-henry-stapp-/transcript.txt

8. 08 · yt0.752

   Prof: All right, today's topic is the theory of nearly everything, okay? You wanted to know the theory of everything? You're almost there, because I'm finally ready to reveal to you the laws of quantum dynamics that tells you how things change with time. So that's the analog of F = ma. That's called the Schrˆdinger equation, and just about anything you see in this room, or on this planet, anything you can see or use is really described by this equation I'm going to write down today. It contains Newton's laws as part of it, because if you can do the quantum theory, you can always find hidden in…

   yt/Iy6RspNw80E-24-quantum-mechanics-vi-time-dependent-schr-dinger-equation/transcript.txt

9. 09 · yt0.751

   Are actually states of a. Field, just like the waves of the sea are states of the sea. They are part of the sea that cannot be separated from the sea. The same way electrons that are not objects that can be separated from their feel. They are states of the field. They come and they go. And so, this, this idea, then it makes a lot of sense because if we now say that. One wants to know. Itself, then we can explain. Why. Quantum. Fields in quantum physics have the crazy properties. The physics is a found. That the, you know, the property of the quantum state of a field. For example, a, are not pr…

   yt/w6cBQESNDV0-federico-faggin-merging-science-spirituality-quantum-physics/transcript.txt

10. 10 · yt0.745

    I tell you, you do this, you get these answers. That's my whole goal, to simply give you the recipe. So the recipe says--what's interesting about quantum mechanics, what makes it hard to teach, is that there are some physical principles which are summarized by these rules, which are like axioms. Then there are some purely mathematical results which are not axioms. They are consequences of pure mathematics. You have to keep in mind, what is a purely mathematical result, therefore is deduced from the laws of mathematics, and what is a physical result, that's deduced from experiment. The fact tha…

    yt/Iy6RspNw80E-24-quantum-mechanics-vi-time-dependent-schr-dinger-equation/transcript.txt