Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.871

   > of the things that physicists like Schrodinger couldn't accept they could never figure out how could you be entangled in a warm wet environment that's like a big problem for physics until you understand the chemistry of water what does water fundamentally do when it changes its Bond angles it's it basically controls the atomic organization of everything inside a cell then you start thinking about it where is water creating the cell cytochrome C oxidase

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/cytochrome/002-of-the-things-that-physicists-like-schrodinger-couldn-t-acce.md

2. 02 · _intake0.817

   So why is just confining water to a tube a big deal? Because water has special quantum abilities in this state that it does not have in you bath tub.

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/energy-epigenetics-10-quantum-puzzle.md

3. 03 · yt0.816

   And typically this is set up just so people can have a picture in mind. Typically it's set up where these two particles they had some interaction or perhaps they were even born in the same process. If it's like a decay of a calcium atom that's sending photons out back to back. There's something that allows these two particles to have some intimate connection early on and then they separate and somehow that separation doesn't make them independent of each other any longer. That's a little bit of a tricky claim because I'll just mention as you know in quantum field theory there's a thing called …

   yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt

4. 04 · yt0.801

   - Schrodinger had come up with the idea, but four years earlier, but had not developed it at all. So Everett was the one who didn't know about that, and developed it fully. But both of them used the Schrodinger picture. Therefore, their description of it was, had this problem that you change the wave function here, and it just, something changes over there. And its description of, for example, entanglement, is not intuitive. Because you move something at, you have two entangled particles. You move a magnet near one of the entangled particles, and it changes the wave function at the other one. …

   yt/Af5LICjFIBc-what-is-quantum-mechanics-really-telling-us-world-science-fe/transcript.txt

5. 05 · yt0.798

   Yeah, that too. But the point I was making is his fundamental issue of this telepathic collapse. You can do that with a single particle. Yeah. You don't you don't need the the formulas of entanglement, but the entanglement does take it further in certain ways, right? Uh which I'd love to get to pretty much now because 1935 rolls around and he starts to work with Pedulski and Rosen. Um the idea of entanglement was already known, right? Schroinger had already described entanglement. No. Are you sure? Because my understanding again do correct me if my history is wrong but I thought Schroinger ear…

   yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt

6. 06 · yt0.794

   These can be in what's called an "entangled state." So then you have a much richer structure of this physical system. So an example of an entangled state, a very famous thing called a "Bell state", would be where you set these things up. So the system of these two qubits, let's say they're up and down these spins, right? So I can have the state up, down plus down, up, by that a complete description of this state, up, down, plus down, up. What does that mean? So let's say I take one of these electrons and I separate them. It's a very famous paper written by Einstein Podolsky and Rosen that firs…

   yt/BHEhxPuMmQI-physicist-brian-cox-explains-quantum-physics-in-22-minutes/transcript.txt

7. 07 · yt0.791

   And it's interesting because I don't mean to jump around too much, but the famous 1935 paper Einstein Podilski Rosen, which we'll get into maybe in a couple minutes, but the reason I bring it up now is my understanding is that Einstein was somewhat upset at that paper because this issue that he had of this I guess in this language telepathic approach to the change of the wave function, it got kind of buried. Mhm. Within this more complex arena of entanglement where my understanding is he said we could have explained the issue without having to bring in all this architecture of entangled partic…

   yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt

8. 08 · _intake0.788

   Water, however has some interesting properties that our radiologist friend might not have known. **Water is what hides quantum mechanisms from biology.** Water is a cell’s natural Faraday cage. It also is special inside cells because of how its made. We live in world of the infinitely small where quantum physics dominates all biologic effects inside of mitochondria. And that world is quite different from the world we observe. *The job of a quantum clinician is to teach a patient how to see the things with their mind that their eyes cannot observe and MRI’s happens to be one of my major teachin…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/redox-rx-2-biohacking-mri.md

9. 09 · yt0.784

   ♪ ♪ It all sounds too strange to be true, but particles really can behave like those coins. In quantum physics, it's called "entanglement." KAISER: Entanglement is really just a stubborn, stubborn, exciting and/or frustrating fact that takes a long time to try to get our heads around. Entanglement is certainly the most interesting and the most confusing aspect of quantum. It's one of these things we don't see, you know, naively in the world around us, but it is taking place deep in the materials that exist around us every day. NARRATOR: And while you probably won't come across a coin entangler…

   yt/t06aTX9jM34-decoding-the-universe-quantum-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt

10. 10 · yt0.783

    Are actually states of a. Field, just like the waves of the sea are states of the sea. They are part of the sea that cannot be separated from the sea. The same way electrons that are not objects that can be separated from their feel. They are states of the field. They come and they go. And so, this, this idea, then it makes a lot of sense because if we now say that. One wants to know. Itself, then we can explain. Why. Quantum. Fields in quantum physics have the crazy properties. The physics is a found. That the, you know, the property of the quantum state of a field. For example, a, are not pr…

    yt/w6cBQESNDV0-federico-faggin-merging-science-spirituality-quantum-physics/transcript.txt