do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end of the 1990s but I always felt there was a certain inelegance because I was
- Concept
- relativity
- Score
- 8 · always · because · i-proved
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · _intake0.935
> do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end of the 1990s but I always felt there was a certain inelegance because I was
_intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/relativity/001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th.md
- 02 · _intake0.808
- [`001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th`](relativity/001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th.md) — score=8 `03:12:14.200` — do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end o - [`002-the-top-clock-always-has-to-run-faster-than-every-other-and-`](relativity/002-the-top-clock-always-has-to-run-faster-than-every-other-and-.md) — score=7 `01:16:16.200` — the top clock always has to run faster than every other. And the reason is a physics reason. It's tied back to Einstein' - …
_intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/INDEX.md
- 03 · yt0.781
Actually, the most bizarre thing is that I, back in the early '80s, when I was doing a bunch of technology development trying to understand things about recursive function evaluation for technology development, I thought I was doing that. I was also working on gauge theory and QCD and quantum field theory and so on. I thought that was a, and also in general relativity and so on, I thought these were completely separate activities. Only to discover recently that the questions about how you choose simultane…
yt/yAJTctpzp5w-can-space-and-time-emerge-from-simple-rules-stephen-wolfram-/transcript.txt
- 04 · yt0.778
If I challenge you not to find the general theory of relativity, but rather to implement the general theory of relativity in your computational paradigm, is that always doable? Is it tough to do? Is it trivial to do? Well, that will be the traditional kind of natural science approach, is drill down from what we already see. There I am. That was the thing, you asked about my own personal trajectory, that was the thing that I learned to do when I was doing things like particle physics and cosmology in…
yt/yAJTctpzp5w-can-space-and-time-emerge-from-simple-rules-stephen-wolfram-/transcript.txt
- 05 · yt0.767
And I was realizing that a bunch of what I'm doing is kind of following on from what people did about 100 years ago, maybe sometimes a little bit more than 100 years ago. And I was wondering, why is it that a bunch of things I'm interested in, I'm going back and looking at what people did 100 years ago, and what I'm saying, they got stuck. I think we can now make progress. What happened? I think what happened is that in the 1800s, there was this kind of push towards abstraction. There was this idea …
yt/FkYer0xP37E-stephen-wolfram-s-radical-theory-of-everything/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.761
Brian: Now, one thing in that book, which is interesting to me is that when physicists typically learn the mathematical methods of general relativity, differential geometry to be concrete, most physicists learn it in a so called coordinate form, which is the more nuts and bolts ingredients necessary to really carry out certain kinds of calculations. You're at great pains in that book to do both the coordinate version, and the coordinate-free version, which is perhaps maybe the way more mathema…
yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt
- 07 · yt0.752
I accept general relativity, but everything we do is slightly wrong. We call, we call Pati-Salam by the wrong name. We have the wrong grand unified real forms of the group. SU five is really SU three comma, uh, SU three comma two. SO 10 is really spin 10 and spin 10 is really spin six comma four. Like the amount of wear and tear on the mind to hear somebody say, no, no, no. I accept all these things, but we've, we've minorly got everything shifted. I think there's a huge barrier to entry in Geo. But …
yt/ILlhFKuu3NQ-geometric-unity-unifying-all-forces-generations-eric-weinste/transcript.txt
- 08 · yt0.750
I kind of uh u and ended up starting to write papers and things about about particle physics. Uh later also cosmology which at the time was sort of a separate branch of physics from from particle physics. Anyway, so uh that got me sort of I got to do a bunch of particle physics. So been my kind of goal was to sort of be a physicist when I was growing up. So by the time I was about 20 years old, I was sort of a a young faculty member doing physics and um but the thing that had happened was I guess I had had sort of the secret weapon of using computers to figure out things in physics and particu…
yt/OWyugUdBups-stephen-wolfram-computation-at-the-foundations-of-everything/transcript.txt
- 09 · yt0.748
Track one was for maybe the beginner. Track two, the person wants to go more deeply, which is a great structure. From that point on, when I read your book, for years when I would give a technical lecture, I would do, here are the track one slides, here are the track two slides, and try to appeal to a broader group of individuals who could follow the ideas. But perhaps maybe not the mathematics, which I think is a powerful way of going about it. But back to black holes then. By what era would y…
yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt
- 10 · yt0.747
But that's kind of, you know, you have to, that's just one of these things when you kind of start sort of thinking computationally about things, this idea that you can see as deep into the computation as possible is important, rather than saying, “All I care about here is this thing of plotting this one curve, because that's what scientists have done for the last couple of hundred years.” I think one of the things I realized only very recently about my own personal sort of scientific journey, is back in t…
yt/FkYer0xP37E-stephen-wolfram-s-radical-theory-of-everything/transcript.txt
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/02-physics/