bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

relativity

do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end of the 1990s but I always felt there was a certain inelegance because I was
Concept
relativity
Score
8 · always · because · i-proved
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.935

    > do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end of the 1990s but I always felt there was a certain inelegance because I was

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/relativity/001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th.md

  2. 02 · _intake0.808

    - [`001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th`](relativity/001-do-i-figured-out-about-multi-way-systems-um-i-figured-out-th.md) — score=8 `03:12:14.200` — do I figured out about multi-way systems um I figured out the things about general relativity I figured out by the end o - [`002-the-top-clock-always-has-to-run-faster-than-every-other-and-`](relativity/002-the-top-clock-always-has-to-run-faster-than-every-other-and-.md) — score=7 `01:16:16.200` — the top clock always has to run faster than every other. And the reason is a physics reason. It's tied back to Einstein' -

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/INDEX.md

  3. 03 · yt0.781

    Actually, the most bizarre thing  is that I, back in the early '80s, when I was   doing a bunch of technology development trying  to understand things about recursive function   evaluation for technology development, I thought I  was doing that. I was also working on gauge theory   and QCD and quantum field theory and so on. I thought that was a, and also in general   relativity and so on, I thought these were  completely separate activities. Only to discover   recently that the questions about how you choose  simultane

    yt/yAJTctpzp5w-can-space-and-time-emerge-from-simple-rules-stephen-wolfram-/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.778

    If I challenge you not to find the  general theory of relativity, but rather to   implement the general theory of relativity in your  computational paradigm, is that always doable? Is   it tough to do? Is it trivial to do? Well, that will be the traditional   kind of natural science approach, is  drill down from what we already see.  There I am. That was the thing,   you asked about my own personal trajectory,  that was the thing that I learned to do when   I was doing things like particle physics and  cosmology in

    yt/yAJTctpzp5w-can-space-and-time-emerge-from-simple-rules-stephen-wolfram-/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.767

    And I was realizing that a   bunch of what I'm doing is kind of following  on from what people did about 100 years ago,   maybe sometimes a little bit more than 100 years  ago. And I was wondering, why is it that a bunch   of things I'm interested in, I'm going back  and looking at what people did 100 years ago,   and what I'm saying, they got stuck. I think  we can now make progress. What happened? I think what happened is that in  the 1800s, there was this kind of   push towards abstraction. There was this idea 

    yt/FkYer0xP37E-stephen-wolfram-s-radical-theory-of-everything/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.761

    Brian: Now, one thing in   that book, which is interesting to me is  that when physicists typically learn the   mathematical methods of general relativity,  differential geometry to be concrete,   most physicists learn it in a so called  coordinate form, which is the more nuts and   bolts ingredients necessary to really carry out  certain kinds of calculations. You're at great   pains in that book to do both the coordinate  version, and the coordinate-free version,   which is perhaps maybe the way more mathema

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.752

    I accept general relativity,  but everything we do is slightly wrong. We call,   we call Pati-Salam by the wrong name. We have  the wrong grand unified real forms of the group.   SU five is really SU three comma, uh, SU three  comma two. SO 10 is really spin 10 and spin 10   is really spin six comma four. Like the amount of  wear and tear on the mind to hear somebody say,   no, no, no. I accept all these things, but  we've, we've minorly got everything shifted. I   think there's a huge barrier to entry in Geo. But 

    yt/ILlhFKuu3NQ-geometric-unity-unifying-all-forces-generations-eric-weinste/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.750

    I kind of uh u and ended up starting to write papers and things about about particle physics. Uh later also cosmology which at the time was sort of a separate branch of physics from from particle physics. Anyway, so uh that got me sort of I got to do a bunch of particle physics. So been my kind of goal was to sort of be a physicist when I was growing up. So by the time I was about 20 years old, I was sort of a a young faculty member doing physics and um but the thing that had happened was I guess I had had sort of the secret weapon of using computers to figure out things in physics and particu

    yt/OWyugUdBups-stephen-wolfram-computation-at-the-foundations-of-everything/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.748

    Track  one was for maybe the beginner. Track two,   the person wants to go more deeply, which  is a great structure. From that point on,   when I read your book, for years when I  would give a technical lecture, I would do,   here are the track one slides, here are the track  two slides, and try to appeal to a broader group   of individuals who could follow the ideas. But  perhaps maybe not the mathematics, which I think   is a powerful way of going about it. But back to black holes then. By what   era would y

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · yt0.747

    But that's kind of,   you know, you have to, that's just one of these  things when you kind of start sort of thinking   computationally about things, this idea that you  can see as deep into the computation as possible   is important, rather than saying, “All I care  about here is this thing of plotting this one   curve, because that's what scientists have  done for the last couple of hundred years.” I think one of the things I realized only  very recently about my own personal sort   of scientific journey, is back in t

    yt/FkYer0xP37E-stephen-wolfram-s-radical-theory-of-everything/transcript.txt

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/