connected and I always believe this the reason why people become entangled is because you needed to hear that what you experienced back then is tied to Quantum biology that is the key and I would tell
- Concept
- quantum
- Score
- 5 · always · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · _intake0.945
> connected and I always believe this the reason why people become entangled is because you needed to hear that what you experienced back then is tied to Quantum biology that is the key and I would tell
_intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/quantum/004-connected-and-i-always-believe-this-the-reason-why-people-be.md
- 02 · yt0.776
And typically this is set up just so people can have a picture in mind. Typically it's set up where these two particles they had some interaction or perhaps they were even born in the same process. If it's like a decay of a calcium atom that's sending photons out back to back. There's something that allows these two particles to have some intimate connection early on and then they separate and somehow that separation doesn't make them independent of each other any longer. That's a little bit of a tricky claim because I'll just mention as you know in quantum field theory there's a thing called …
yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt
- 03 · yt0.767
This is what quantum physics the the the quantum field theory have shown that the foundational aspect of reality are the quantum fields of particles. So already quantum physics is saying everything is interconnected and the interconnection comes from what is called quantum uh entanglement. The entanglement is that that the the aspects of the you know the states of the fields when they interact they create properties in common that connects them independent of the distance and therefore you have properties here that says that non-locality is the way the universe is is built where the whole idea…
yt/cXlxCOoNZ7E-spacetime-is-the-memory-of-a-self-knowing-universe-federico-/transcript.txt
- 04 · yt0.759
Just like we can tell our kids, "Oh, yeah," you know, "I was born before the internet, I was born before smartphones," 50 years from now, people are going to be telling stories about technologies that are normal that today we can't even fathom. I believe 50 years from now, people growing up won't think twice about entanglement, superposition... I think that will be commonplace. One of the things I love about quantum mechanics is that it seems non-intuitive to us. It tells us that there's something beyond just what we think we understand. We can't always rely on our intuition. We have to rely o…
yt/t06aTX9jM34-decoding-the-universe-quantum-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt
- 05 · yt0.753
You know, I was observing myself because my conscious was in this you know sea of white scintillating light that was coming out of me. So, so I am you know I am both the source and the observer. I'm of of this thing you know that I am observing and and uh and what I am is love joy and peace which is you know wow that's crazy you know I I thought I was a you know I was a human being a machine uh made of biological stuff and of course in those days I had not come to the conclusion that biology was had to be quantum and classical. I thought you know I I again I bought the the idea that life is a …
yt/QfP5BgOz97U-quantum-consciousness-and-the-illusion-of-reality-federico-f/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.749
Knowing is an experience. That's me. One say that's me. It knows itself. >> Yeah. >> It brings into at the same time that it knows itself, it brings it into existence. Okay. And it must be a part whole of itself. Why? It's not made of parts. One is not made of parts. It cannot see itself just a little bit. It's got to see itself completely in the direction in which it look at itself. >> What [clears throat] is direction? The direction is the identity of what it brings into existence. That's the identity of the sati. It brings into existence a saty. A part of itself that now b…
yt/cXlxCOoNZ7E-spacetime-is-the-memory-of-a-self-knowing-universe-federico-/transcript.txt
- 07 · yt0.744
So objects are uh bundles of functions. And they uh objects are basically subunivers and because we cannot comprehend the universe as a whole, we carve it up into little small systems. And these systems are tightly coupled within and loosely coupled across each other. So if I have an object like this, I can take this from the ground and the ground doesn't change very much. this object doesn't change very much because the relationships between this and this are relatively sparse and the relationship within this are such that if I break them the object disappears for me in the vein which I model…
yt/oR-BQTSpL5U-joscha-bach-the-operation-of-consciousness-agi-25/transcript.txt
- 08 · yt0.744
Everything is connected and each and every topic in spirit science is connected too. Perhaps in a deeper way than any of us might know. In a nutshell, that's really what spirit science is about. We're making connections. Connections between our understanding of reality and ideas about the way that things work on a physical, quantum, metaphysical, spiritual, and all manner of ways. If we find that things are not connected, we can add new points to find the connections. The way that science is hoping that finding the Higs bzon will bridge some gaps between the standard model of physics and under…
yt/GYbb3faWokA-the-great-awakening-of-human-consciousness/transcript.txt
- 09 · yt0.744
And it's interesting because I don't mean to jump around too much, but the famous 1935 paper Einstein Podilski Rosen, which we'll get into maybe in a couple minutes, but the reason I bring it up now is my understanding is that Einstein was somewhat upset at that paper because this issue that he had of this I guess in this language telepathic approach to the change of the wave function, it got kind of buried. Mhm. Within this more complex arena of entanglement where my understanding is he said we could have explained the issue without having to bring in all this architecture of entangled partic…
yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt
- 10 · yt0.743
Yeah, that too. But the point I was making is his fundamental issue of this telepathic collapse. You can do that with a single particle. Yeah. You don't you don't need the the formulas of entanglement, but the entanglement does take it further in certain ways, right? Uh which I'd love to get to pretty much now because 1935 rolls around and he starts to work with Pedulski and Rosen. Um the idea of entanglement was already known, right? Schroinger had already described entanglement. No. Are you sure? Because my understanding again do correct me if my history is wrong but I thought Schroinger ear…
yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/02-physics/