Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.947

   > then you begin to realize there is no correct answer and there is no real truth why because the truth is subject to new data that comes in and that actually is exactly what Quantum biology

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/quantum/002-then-you-begin-to-realize-there-is-no-correct-answer-and-the.md

2. 02 · yt0.820

   You give me the quantum state of the universe right now. This is the equation that tells you what happens next. It is not teological. It is not moral. It does not care what you do. It does not judge you. There is no goal or purpose towards which it strives. There's no causes and effects in this equation. It's just a pattern just like 6 7 8 9 10. Now you might object a slightly more sophisticated version of the previous objection is okay you have equations but I don't believe that your equations are truly fundamental unless they can fit on a t-shirt. So I prove to you that that can happen. Once…

   yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt

3. 03 · pubmed0.815

   The word 'uncertainty', in the context of quantum mechanics, usually evokes an impression of an essential unknowability of what might actually be going on at the quantum level of activity, as is made explicit in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and in the fact that the theory normally provides only probabilities for the results of quantum measurement. These issues limit our ultimate understanding of the behaviour of things, if we take quantum mechanics to represent an absolute truth. But they do not cause us to put that very 'truth' into question. This article addresses the issue of quantum…

   pubmed/PMID-22042902-uncertainty-in-quantum-mechanics-faith-or-fantasy/info.md

4. 04 · _intake0.808

   Just from common sense, quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd. QED was not around during Darwin’s life, so I can give him a pass on this. I cannot afford that luxury to Dawkins, who has made his career as Darwin’s highest priest. Dawkins has tried to argue Darwin’s thesis and ideas with fancy prose, but he does this without any quantum substance. And yet, quantum mechanics, when tested, fully agree with Lady Evolution. This means we must go after today’s beliefs to uncover a better answer. It is buried under stones no one has picked up. When the quantum experiments have validated nature…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/osf-3-darwin-was-wrong.md

5. 05 · yt0.807

   I mean you you you have a certain range of of of statements that you're talking about and within that category of statements everything is either true or false and all physicists agree that this calculation uh is should be done in this way and uh there's not any ambiguities. So this goes against it doesn't exactly go against but all of these things have been said uh where you equate true and false and say they're both true is not part of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is just the opposite. Everything is that you deal with is either true or false. And u so how does quantum theory then put…

   yt/v73S4BkItrc-panel-quantum-theory-and-free-will-chris-fields-henry-stapp-/transcript.txt

6. 06 · pubmed0.800

   We still lack any consensus about what one is actually talking about as one uses quantum mechanics. There is a gap between the abstract terms in which the theory is couched and the phenomena the theory enables each of us to account for so well. Because it has no practical consequences for how we each use quantum mechanics to deal with physical problems, this cognitive dissonance has managed to coexist with the quantum theory from the very beginning. The absence of conceptual clarity for almost a century suggests that the problem might lie in some implicit misconceptions about the nature of sci…

   pubmed/PMID-30232960-making-better-sense-of-quantum-mechanics/info.md

7. 07 · yt0.792

   When you, when you make a measurement, do these physical properties become defined? Yeah. Before you make the measurement, you can only speak of a superposition of different possibilities. A wave of probabilities, so to say, but not of a defined physical existence. Yeah. So if there is a cat in a box and, and there is an apparatus inside the box that breaks a vial of poison depending on whether a certain atom decays or not. And that, that decays, that is a quantum event. Yeah. It's not a deterministic event as far as I know. Random event. Yeah, yeah. Then random meaning we don't know how it un…

   yt/DyzHYnOqIoU-10k-subscribers-a-q-a-with-bernardo-kastrup/transcript.txt

8. 08 · yt0.792

   Zero it doesn't mean none but it means 0%. So if you're a betting person um the the good bet is against seeing the truth. Now, someone can come back and say, "Well, I don't like that." I mean, and most a lot of people do. They come back and say, "I don't like that." And my attitude is that's perfectly fine. I have no skin in the game. I don't care. I'm just telling you what the current theory says. The current theory says all fitness payoff functions are equally likely. And I say, "Okay, they're all equally likely. Then the probability that you see the truth is zero." Now, someone can come alo…

   yt/xaeafKPfs1M-the-greatest-discovery-about-reality-the-consciousness-behin/transcript.txt

9. 09 · _intake0.791

   Physics has already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt these mechanisms exist in nature. Biology just has no clue they are at work under their noses. The problem for biologists is that the subatomic world has been experimentally proven to a far greater degree than anything printed in biology anywhere. Moreover, QED has been proven to be very accurate by being experimentally proven correct every time one tries it out. Biology can not claim the same record. QED has been shown to act everywhere in nature, while in biology, they continue to argue about metabolism of macronutrients for 100 years, an…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/ee-6-quantum-cell-theory-life-collective-phenomena.md

10. 10 · _intake0.789

    Atoms are in everything that makes us, especially proteins. Every part of you is controlled by atoms right now. All atoms are quantized. The laws of the universe scale from the quantum level to the macroscopic level. Quantum mechanics is foundational to everything in this universe. This implies that, in order to have a fundamental understanding of life, you must have a quantized molecular mechanism to prove your theory. Darwin has nothing to prove anything he wrote in the Origin of Species. He provided us with observations that correlated to morphologic change. This is correlative data, not ca…

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/osf-3-darwin-was-wrong.md