bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

photoelectric

ring looks really similar. You know, there must be a story here. And the story was I thought the story was always going to be about the different number of electrons and the photoelectric
Concept
photoelectric
Score
5 · always · must
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.963

    > ring looks really similar. You know, there must be a story here. And the story was I thought the story was always going to be about the different number of electrons and the photoelectric

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/photoelectric/002-ring-looks-really-similar.md

  2. 02 · yt0.784

    You know the difference is? In the middle of it, you got an iron atom. Iron has a different atomic number. It It has um a few more electrons than magnesium. Why is this a big deal? Cuz the same thing that happens in chlorophyll happens in Joe. Happens in Jack. And and here's the irony. Go back to that guy we talked about earlier, Einstein. He won a Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect. You know what that means? The only way you can deliver light to different tissues in that tree or me is through the electrons that you collect. So, what's the difference between a tree and us fundamentally f

    yt/jtMu-KFyKxM-bitcoin-is-a-time-machine-with-dr-jack-kruse/transcript.txt

  3. 03 · yt0.783

    All right, so this is the story. So now comes the French physicist, de Broglie, and he argued as follows - you'll find his argument quite persuasive, and this is what he did for his PhD. He said, "If light, which I thought was a particle-- I'm sorry, which I thought was a wave, is actually made up of particles, perhaps things which I always thought of as particles, like electrons, have a wave associated with them." And he said, "Let me postulate that electrons also have a wave associated with them and that the wavelength associated with an electron of momentum p will be 2pℏ /p; and that this w

    yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.776

    What if if you took a powerful microscope and you looked into the heart of matter and you didn't find a swarm of little dots, but you found a swarm of little vibrating filaments. And the motivation for that came from the fact that with that move, the tension between quantum mechanics and general relativity went away. Mhm. That little tiny move from dot to filament was what you needed for the mathematics of these two theories to harmoniously meld together. So if this picture is correct, the electron would be a little vibrating filament and the quirks, they would be little vibrating filaments an

    yt/o9z5il_FQUw-string-theory-multiverse-and-divine-design-brian-greene/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.763

    Now sometimes people think, "Well, if you have a lot of electrons coming here, maybe these guys bumped into these guys and collided and therefore didn't hit the screen at that point." That's a fake. You know you don't have much of a chance with that explanation, because if there are random collisions, what are the odds they'll form this beautiful, repeatable pattern? Not very big. Furthermore, you can silence that criticism by making the electron gun that emits electrons so feeble that at a given time, there's only one electron. There's only one electron in the lab. It left here, then it arriv

    yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.755

    But Jun's optical clocks are so accurate that even a small difference in elevation between two clocks will reveal a discrepancy in the passage of time. When the clock changes elevation by a few hundred microns, basically size of a human hair, you will start to be able to see that time is actually running differently. ♪ ♪ NARRATOR: With that much accuracy, a clock transforms into something more than a timepiece. It becomes a new window into the nature of the universe. ♪ ♪ YE: Making a clock is much more than just a piece to keep time. It is a sensor to explore fundamental physics, to expand our

    yt/t06aTX9jM34-decoding-the-universe-quantum-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.753

    It feels so real because we don't know better. BERLIN: And most of the time, we all agree on that simulation. It's when we don't that we can learn something. So do you remember the dress? Of course. Did you see this dress or this one? It's a simple question, but the answer has divided friends and family. White and gold. Blue and black. I remember it caused quite the stir, right? Massive stir. A polarizing debate that took over the internet. ♪ ♪ LAFER-SOUSA: People had existential crises over this image. People tweeted things like, "If that's not white and gold, my life has been a lie." Swear o

    yt/HU6LfXNeQM4-your-brain-perception-deception-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.751

    Built up Newton; shot down. Built up Maxwell; going to get shot down. So again, I have tried to drill into all of you the notion that people get shot down because somebody else does a new experiment that probes an entirely new regime which had not been seen before. So it's not that people were dumb; it's that given the information they had, they built the best theory that they could. And if you give me more additional information, more refined measurements, something to the tenth decimal place, I may have to change what I do. That's how it's going to be. So there's always going to be--for exam

    yt/uK2eFv7ne_Q-19-quantum-mechanics-i-the-key-experiments-and-wave-particle/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.750

    It's not somehow a magical. is not made of a magical classical substance that's has different physics to it. So why should I have to make this distinction? As I said, why isn't this just a regular physical interaction between two physical things? Now the the little piece of data I'll just mention is is Adam Becker wrote a nice book called What is Real? which was a popular book about Bell and about David Bow and about Hugh Everett and certain people who were running against this stream of mainstream physics. Uh he was very critical of Bor and Copenhogen in the book and he has a degree in cosmol

    yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · _intake0.748

    This is the EXACT shape of a bridge. Compare to `light` (the bridge): - Light = EM radiation → PHYSICS - Light absorption in cytochrome c oxidase → BIOPHYSICS - "Let there be light" → SACRED - Illumination, chiaroscuro → ART - ...

    _intake/MUSIC-BRANCH-VS-BRIDGE-ANALYSIS.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/