Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.745

   “It was claimed” is suitably cautious. I’d not be surprised if this were true, however. The rest of the article ought to disturb people’s complacency, too, but I’m not sure it will.

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/organizational-structural-failure-7-autophagy-fail.md

2. 02 · _intake0.744

   > it. I also believe that you need to have a decentralized doctor under your care to tell you whether it's a good thing for your current template. that I never use methylene blue orally.

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/methylene-blue/001-it.md

3. 03 · blog0.734

   It is just rough, and that is the right and final answer to the question of the relation of “France is hexagonal” to France. It is a rough description; it is not a true or a false one. (1962b: 143) What Austin characterises in his final denial is the sentence “France is hexagonal”, in relation to France. He needn’t, and doesn’t, deny that on occasion, for particular intents and purposes, one might use the sentence to state a truth. However, he suggests that, in some cases, the circumstances of utterance may be such that no truth-evaluable statement is made by the use of a sentence. Suppose, fo…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/john-langshaw-austin.md

4. 04 · yt0.734

   A lot of other uh pro-methyline blue people have criticized Paul Saladino for that. Again, I've heard mixed things. Uh what are your thoughts on methyl and blue? And and should an average person use it? Who should use it? And how should they use it if they need to use it? >> The number one thing you need to understand is context. Who are the doctors that are experts in using methylene blue? Cardiovascular surgeons and neurosurgeons. What's my day job? I'm a neurosurgeon. Remember Paul Saladino is a psychiatrist. They never use methylene blue. So I want you to understand what did methylen…

   yt/2-AKskkKZzA-sunlight-is-king-w-dr-jack-kruse/transcript.txt

5. 05 · archive0.729

   If statements of fact themselves depend upon the person who observes them, how much more distinct is the reflection of the per- sonality of him who gives an account of methods and of philosophical speculations which form the essence of science ! For this reason there will inevitably be much that is subjective in every objective exposi- tion of scieuce. And as an individual production is only significant in virtue of that which has preceded and that which is contemporary with it, it resembles a mirror which in reflecting exaggerates the size and clearness of neighbouring objects, and causes a p…

   archive/principlesofchem01menduoft/principlesofchem01menduoft_djvu.txt

6. 06 · blog0.727

   He infers that Toscar’s word “water” is true of x if and only if x is twater and that when Toscar says, while pointing at a liquid in a glass, “That is water,” his utterance is true if and only if the liquid in the glass is twater. Putnam concludes that the truth conditions of Oscar’s and Toscar’s utterances of sentences containing the term “water” are not determined by their narrow psychological states. In a final step he argues that this was true even in 1750, before chemists on Earth or Twin Earth discovered the chemical structures of water and twater. Illusions of reference for general ter…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/content-externalism-and-skepticism.md

7. 07 · blog0.726

   And such a theory has been defended. Ned Markosian (1998) argues that not only does brutalism, the doctrine that there are brute facts about when the x s compose a y , solve the Problem of the Many, the account of composition it implies fits more naturally with our intuitions about composition. It seems objectionable, in some not easy-to-pin-down way, to rely on brute facts in just this way. Here is how Terrence Horgan puts the objection: In particular, a good metaphysical theory or scientific theory should avoid positing a plethora of quite specific, disconnected, sui generis , compositional …

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/the-problem-of-the-many.md

8. 08 · gutenberg0.722

   BANQUO. Good sir, why do you start and seem to fear Things that do sound so fair?—I’ th’ name of truth, Are ye fantastical, or that indeed Which outwardly ye show? My noble partner You greet with present grace and great prediction Of noble having and of royal hope, That he seems rapt withal. To me you speak not. If you can look into the seeds of time, And say which grain will grow, and which will not, Speak then to me, who neither beg nor fear Your favours nor your hate.

   gutenberg/PG-1533-macbeth/PG-1533.txt

9. 09 · blog0.721

   In his opinion, there are two fundamental modes of being proper to things: being by itself, which characterizes substances, and being or inhering in something else, which characterizes accidents. The latter is subdivided into three less general modes: being in something else in virtue of its matter; being in something else in virtue of its form; and being in something else in virtue of the whole composite. Something can inhere in something else in virtue of its matter, form, and composite according to three different ways: from inside ( ab intrinseco ), from outside ( ab extrinseco ), and part…

   blog/plato-stanford-edu/robert-alyngton.md

10. 10 · yt0.721

    It ultimately has to be the If to be and to be understood is to one, that which one's, right? Can't be grasped by anything that has any the any difference or distinction within it. This is Plotinus's famous argument. Yeah. Uh, and I I take it that that's ultimately the case. If we claimed to measure the one, it can't possibly be the one. Um, And then the last thing I just wanted to get in is Karen's comment about the control of some men by other men, right? Which is where we've gotten to with science and with nominalism, right? There is this, uh, situation now culturally where, cuz, you know, …

    yt/QvLSkzes_II-convergence-to-neoplatonism-w-wolfgang-smith/transcript.txt