bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

hawking

for me, and for Stephen Hawking, was pictures, mental pictures or diagrams that you draw, as well as words that go along with those pictures. The ratio of words and pictures to equations in that book has absolutely never been seen before in any relativity textbooks. It's a book that is designed to try to teach physical intuition to a new generation of physicists who are just beginning to get interested in relativity because quasars and pulsars have recently been
Concept
hawking
Score
5 · never · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.843

    > that book has absolutely never been seen before in any relativity textbooks. It's a book that is designed to try to teach physical intuition to a new generation of physicists who are just beginning to get interested in relativity because quasars and pulsars have recently been discovered in the cosmic microwave background. Suddenly, it's relevant to the astronomical world. We need to build a generation that thinks physically. That's what the

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/big-bang/002-that-book-has-absolutely-never-been-seen-before-in-any-relat.md

  2. 02 · yt0.841

    Then you intuit something, then you  go in and do a calculation, you see whether you're   right or not, and you get the details right.  The foundation for physical intuition, for John,   for me, and for Stephen Hawking, was pictures,  mental pictures or diagrams that you draw, as   well as words that go along with those pictures. The ratio of words and pictures to equations in   that book has absolutely never been seen before  in any relativity textbooks. It's a book that is   designed to try to teach physical intuition&nbsp

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  3. 03 · yt0.816

    Brian: Now, one thing in   that book, which is interesting to me is  that when physicists typically learn the   mathematical methods of general relativity,  differential geometry to be concrete,   most physicists learn it in a so called  coordinate form, which is the more nuts and   bolts ingredients necessary to really carry out  certain kinds of calculations. You're at great   pains in that book to do both the coordinate  version, and the coordinate-free version,   which is perhaps maybe the way more mathema

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.805

    Kip: This is- Kip: The influence on Wheeler at that time. Brian: I see. I see. Kip: This was probably '67,   I think. I think it was a year before John started  using the phrase. John understood the power of   words. He spent a lot of time crafting phrases  and words to describe things. As he described   it to me, he liked to lie in a warm bathtub, and  just think about what is the right phrase to use.  Now, it could be that he was triggered  by that a year or so earlier,   and didn't remember it at all, but in the  back of

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · blog0.795

    Goodman’s claim is that the difference between pictures and diagrams is syntactic, i.e., has to do with the composition of the characters or symbols. Pictorial symbol systems, when compared to diagrammatic systems, tend to be relatively replete . That is, to the interpretation of a picture typically a larger number of features is relevant than to the interpretation of a non-pictorial dense system. A drawing by Hokusai may be made of the same marks as an electrocardiogram. Yet, while in a linear diagram as the electrocardiogram only relative distances from the originating point of the line matt

    blog/plato-stanford-edu/goodman-s-aesthetics.md

  6. 06 · yt0.793

    Actually, Schrödinger did that,   right? Schrödinger had a modified idea. Again,  Schrödinger had an idea of modified gravity.   And he said, “no, no, no, no. Einstein does  these non-symmetric metrics. But actually,   a deeper structural concept than the  metric is the connection.” And there   are connections that come from a metric, and  they're more general connections, right? So,   that was Schrödinger's idea. Actually, a wonderful  book by Schrödinger, Space-Time Structure.   A very beautiful, thin book o

    yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.790

    But the second thing  is how long or how do people reconcile these two   radically different pictures? I mean, we used to  say from special relativity, your clock is going   slow. My clock, we can get our minds around.  This one just seems so radically bizarre. Kip: Well, I think we generally do it by   finding a third point of view where everything  fits together in a beautifully elegant way. Brian: Like Finkelstein. Kip: Yeah,   so called Eddington-Finkelstein coordinate system.  And so you basically, if you adopt this idea tha

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.789

    Professor Ramamurti Shankar: So, let's begin now. First of all, I'm assuming all of you have some idea what special relativity means. There are two theories of relativity, one is the special theory and one is the general theory. The general theory is something that we won't do in any detail. Special theory is something we will do in reasonable detail. So, it's good to begin by asking some of you what is your present understanding of what the subject is all about. Yes, sir? The Yale cap, what do you think it's about? Student: It's about relative speed in two reference systems. Professor Ramamur

    yt/pHfFSQ6pLGU-12-introduction-to-relativity/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · archive0.787

    [Due to transcription or optical character recognition errors in creating online texts, and because of less-than-clear fonts in some printed texts, the variables as read in some of the equations here are not as Einstein intended. For example, the numeral 'one' has frequently been printed and read as the letter 'I.' In addition, some equations do not translate well into the spoken word. If you require completely accurate renditions of Einstein's mathematical formulas, we suggest that you consult a published text.] (Summary written by anonymous [and Laurie Anne Walden])

    archive/relativity_librivox/info.md

  10. 10 · archive0.786

    - **Archive identifier**: `principleofrelat00lore_0` - **URL**: https://archive.org/details/principleofrelat00lore_0 - **Creator**: Lorentz, H. A. (Hendrik Antoon), 1853-1928 - **Date**: 1952 - **Publisher**: [New York] : Dover - **Language**: eng - **License**: (see metadata) - **Mediatype**: texts - **Subjects**: Relativity (Physics), Relativité (Physique), Relativity (Physics), Relativiteitstheorie, Relativitätsprinzip, Relativitätstheorie, Relatividade E Gravitacao, Relativity, Physics - **Captured**: 2026-05-10T10:06:45

    archive/principleofrelat00lore_0/info.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/06-cosmology/