Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.916

   > lead to rep repulsive gravity um and uh lead to all kinds of weird things now can it be done in our universe um you know my immediate thought is no but but you know the fact is that okay so so

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/gravity/004-lead-to-rep-repulsive-gravity-um-and-uh-lead-to-all-kinds-of.md

2. 02 · _intake0.803

   - [`001-it-can-push-outward-as-opposed-to-just-pulling-inward-and-th`](gravity/001-it-can-push-outward-as-opposed-to-just-pulling-inward-and-th.md) — score=8 `00:36:28.079` — it can push outward as opposed to just pulling inward and this is something that we have never experienced because the g - [`002-well-where-did-that-fifth-order-where-was-the-impetus-for-th`](gravity/002-well-where-did-that-fifth-order-where-was-the-impetus-for-th.md) — score=7 `01:48:01.680` — well, where did that fifth order, where was the impetus for the second order coming from? Something like that. Something - [`003-…

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/INDEX.md

3. 03 · _intake0.803

   - [`001-it-can-push-outward-as-opposed-to-just-pulling-inward-and-th`](gravity/001-it-can-push-outward-as-opposed-to-just-pulling-inward-and-th.md) — score=8 `00:36:28.079` — it can push outward as opposed to just pulling inward and this is something that we have never experienced because the g - [`002-well-where-did-that-fifth-order-where-was-the-impetus-for-th`](gravity/002-well-where-did-that-fifth-order-where-was-the-impetus-for-th.md) — score=7 `01:48:01.680` — well, where did that fifth order, where was the impetus for the second order coming from? Something like that. Something - [`003-…

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated/INDEX.md

4. 04 · yt0.762

   No, indeed, everything works out.   Even if you take non-abelian gauge theories.  I actually had a very good master's student,   Alexander Wirtz, he worked on that and we figured  out and no, nothing new comes up. We also tried to   use the same method to break… Because you see what  it is, if you say you have the matter actions,   say you keep the background constant  like an eta mu nu and a Minkowski metric,   right? Flat space. Then you could count these  eta mu nu as a constant. But the idea of gravity   i…

   yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

5. 05 · yt0.757

   And the claim is that Einstein's general theory of relativity, when appropriately combined with quantum mechanics, will do that for you. Which is the other way. It's gravitizing quantum mechanics rather than quantizing gravity. So is it true that you wouldn't have consciousness in Minkowski space? I mean, would it be impossible without gravitational force? I mean, obviously, you'd have matter, you'd have a brain, you'd have some gravitating but is it is it impossible then to have consciousness in a in a region that's either perfectly flat, has no matter, or is otherwise free from perturbations…

   yt/OoDi856wLPM-sir-roger-penrose-stuart-hameroff-collapsing-a-theory-of-qua/transcript.txt

6. 06 · yt0.753

   They can become bigger.   And so physicists are going to want to say, hey,  that's not a physically reasonable space-time.   That's not a physically reasonable model of GR.  And you ask, well, what's your reason? Why not? And the original justifications given  by — it was originally Penrose, Geroch,   and a few others back in the 60s in the golden  era. You look at the justifications there,   and it's very much metaphysics. It's Leibnizian  metaphysics. It's the idea that, oh, well,   nature — why would nature stop when…

   yt/iGOGxaZZHwE-it-s-not-that-we-don-t-know-it-s-that-we-can-t/transcript.txt

7. 07 · yt0.753

   I mean, general  relativity couldn't be right, right? I mean,   it builds with Lorentzian metric that this  is just not possible. But if then, again,   I'm not saying I could then immediately say  how the gravity theory looks like. But if some   phenomenologist makes a really good model for this  matter, now, so say, standard model grade model,   right? So we incorporated the standard model,  let's fantasize. And then we have a standard   model with faster than speed of light neutrinos.  Say, okay, say. Then I woul…

   yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

8. 08 · yt0.752

   That's all pretty good. But if you then said to me, but in that theory you've made certain assumptions. Yes, you assume there's electrons, neutrinos, why those particles and not others. And that really comes down to the question that Einstein really asked in a way. Is there a unique universe that somehow is logically required to be and any deviation from that universe would somehow be logically inconsistent? Einstein said did God have any choice in creating the universe? Could God therefore, in other words, have created the universe differently? Or was God's choices fixed by some sort of maste…

   yt/o9z5il_FQUw-string-theory-multiverse-and-divine-design-brian-greene/transcript.txt

9. 09 · yt0.750

   >> We do measure it by the rate at which distant galaxies are accelerating away from us. And it's this ridiculously small number, >> okay, >> in the units that we typically use to measure these things. And that translates into this particular number for the entropy, the number of states that the universe can possibly be found in. >> Right. Okay, that makes sense. >> But the question you asked before, if we could return it for a second, because it is issue, this issue of infinite number of worlds. Yes. Wait, wait, just before you get there, I just want to remind pe…

   yt/NxMMd5kMu7o-exploring-hidden-dimensions-with-brian-greene/transcript.txt

10. 10 · yt0.750

    The world or nature behaves as though these fictions were true until it doesn’t And then we replace the convenient fictions with other ones. For instance, Newton proposed the convenient fiction that there is an invisible force called gravity, pulling celestial bodies to one another invisibly and at a distance, and instantly. And it took the French about half a century to stop laughing of this mystical idea of these invisible forces pulling things towards one another. but we know how that ended. And yet, in the early 20th century, Einstein showed that there is no such force. There is no such in…

    yt/DyzHYnOqIoU-10k-subscribers-a-q-a-with-bernardo-kastrup/transcript.txt