Wheeler," he always called him Professor Wheeler. I called him Johnny. Feynman says, "I remember one day Professor Wheeler and I were doing a calculation together. Professor Wheeler went from this step to that step. I didn't see how he got there. He showed me. As he'd showed me, he said, 'Little steps for little people.'" Now, John Wheeler was the most polite person I ever knew. I never saw him do anything impolite like that. Now, it's clear that Feynman was full
- Source
- Greatest Mysteries of Gravity | Brian Greene & Kip Thorne | World Science Festival · 00:37:45.680 ↗
- Concept
- feynman
- Score
- 6 · always · never
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · _intake0.925
> Wheeler," he always called him Professor Wheeler. I called him Johnny. Feynman says, "I remember one day Professor Wheeler and I were doing a calculation together. Professor Wheeler went from this step to that step. I didn't see how he got there. He showed me. As he'd showed me, he said, 'Little steps for little people.'" Now, John Wheeler was the most polite person I ever knew. I never saw him do anything impolite like that. Now, it's clear that Feynman was full
_intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/feynman/003-wheeler-he-always-called-him-professor-wheeler.md
- 02 · yt0.783
But the fact that he could was an indication that he really himself was quite deep in the mathematics. Brian: That is so interesting. Kip: He could outthink Feynman. Of course, he had more a number of years behind him. Feynman was just getting started. But still ... Brian: But Feynman is ... Kip: Feynman is phenomenal. Brian: If I can just give one story that you may be familiar with too. I was taking quantum field theory with Sidney Coleman. Sidney Coleman, I think this was an act that he did every year that he talked qua…
yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt
- 03 · yt0.775
Kip: This is- Kip: The influence on Wheeler at that time. Brian: I see. I see. Kip: This was probably '67, I think. I think it was a year before John started using the phrase. John understood the power of words. He spent a lot of time crafting phrases and words to describe things. As he described it to me, he liked to lie in a warm bathtub, and just think about what is the right phrase to use. Now, it could be that he was triggered by that a year or so earlier, and didn't remember it at all, but in the back of …
yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt
- 04 · blog0.742
Ordinary folks, Kripke claims, might know that Feynman was a physicist, but they will not know anything besides the name that would serve to differentiate Feynman from any other physicist they have heard of. An indefinite description like a physicist will not suffice, however, to pick out any particular individual in the world. Even a physicist named ‘Feynman’ won’t do, at least in a world where two physicists bear this name. At best, this sort of description will pick out an arbitrary member of a class of individuals, not the right one consistently. And yet, as Kripke points out, it seems per…
blog/plato-stanford-edu/reference.md
- 05 · yt0.724
But Dick Feynman was really good at doing these calculations and getting to the right answer. And then he would go back and say he didn't think anybody would be impressed by the fact that he got to the right answer by doing this complicated calculation. He thought people would only be impressed if he could come up with this really simple kind of intuitive explanation of what was going on, which he often managed to come up with. Then he would throw away the calculation, never tell anybody about the calcula…
yt/FkYer0xP37E-stephen-wolfram-s-radical-theory-of-everything/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.722
Brian: Now, one thing in that book, which is interesting to me is that when physicists typically learn the mathematical methods of general relativity, differential geometry to be concrete, most physicists learn it in a so called coordinate form, which is the more nuts and bolts ingredients necessary to really carry out certain kinds of calculations. You're at great pains in that book to do both the coordinate version, and the coordinate-free version, which is perhaps maybe the way more mathema…
yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt
- 07 · _intake0.719
- **The Quantum Labyrinth - Richard Feynman & John Wheeler - Quantum Reality & Time** - `yt/KCcX03Q6Lkw-the-quantum-labyrinth-richard-feynman-john-wheeler-quantum-r/transcript.txt` - … Niels <<Bohr>> Niels <<Bohr>> was one of the fathers of <<quantum>> theory a Danish physicist and wheeler had worked with Niels <<Bohr>> over in …
_intake/canon-profiles/bohr-niels.md
- 08 · yt0.718
Brian: Yeah, I can imagine. Kip: His apology and Oppenheimer didn't... And so it was a momentous moment in the history of science that, of miscommunication between these two great men. Brian: And was it an arrogance on Oppenheimer's or just a- Kip: No, no. Brian: ...feeling bad? Kip: I don't think so. Brian: Or what do you think the emotion was? Kip: I think he was just ... I don't know. I didn't know. I knew Wheeler better than I knew Oppenheimer. Certainly Oppenheimer is capable of arrogance, but I don't think so. …
yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt
- 09 · yt0.715
Well, sure, if somebody proves the theorem, I mean, Andrew Wiles proved that there were no x to the n, that you can have a sum of two squares which is another square, but there's no other power which the sum of two of that powers gives you another thing which has the same power I mean, that's mathematical statement and that would be true. Whether the universe had different physical laws and it's completely independent is a mathematical statement is objectively true. How we come across to understand why it is true, maybe very difficult question, very few people really understand, how many peopl…
yt/0nOtLj8UYCw-quantum-consciousness-debate-does-the-wave-function-actually/transcript.txt
- 10 · openalex0.711
Feynman — cited 278x (1989) What Do You Care What Other People Think? — T. C. Holyoke Richard P. Feynman — cited 263x (1971) APPLICATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS TO LIQUID HELIUM — Richard P. Feynman — cited 250x (2018) Quantum Electrodynamics — Richard P. Feynman — cited 248x (1985) <i>‘‘Surely You’re Joking Mr. Feynman!’’ Adventures of a Curious Character</i> — Richard P. Feynman Penny D. Sackett — cited 232x (1987) Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics — Richard P. Feynman Steven Weinberg — cited 209x (2018) Statistical Mechanics — Richard P. Feynman — cited 202x (1966) The Development o…
openalex/A5037710835/info.md
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/02-physics/