operator to get the Einstein tensor capital G mu nu from the Riemann tensor. That thing, there's two branches, right? There's a branch that uses the star operator to do this little trick, which is called the Chern-Simons branch. And then there's the Einstein contraction. And both of those results in Euler-Lagrange equations with the curvature tensor with a contraction, um, that gets you from two forms to one forms. That's how, you know, you're in GU because you're
- Concept
- euler
- Cross-concepts
- einstein · riemann
- Score
- 4 · causes · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · yt0.750
How do you go from Maxwell's equations to the action of Einstein and Hilbert? Spell that out. Okay. So, ask how does this bigger scheme work in the special case if you would, say, start with matter, that is Maxwell electrodynamics, right? Yes. On some metric background. Let's not even say Lorentzian, any metric, any signature. Well, the first thing you would do is to… So, you would find out for what background signature, if you start with a metric like this, would you have a well-defined Cauchy problem for Maxwell's &…
yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt
- 02 · pubmed0.731
This paper describes conservation laws in general relativity (GR) dating back to the mass-energy conservation of Bondi and Sachs in the early 1960s but using 2-spinor techniques. The notion of conformal infinity is employed, and the highly original ideas of E. T. Newman are discussed in relation to twistor theory. The controversial NP constants are introduced, and their meaning is considered in a new light related to the problem of equations of motion in GR. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'At the interface of asymptotics, conformal methods and analysis in general relativity…
pubmed/PMID-38219775-from-conformal-infinity-to-equations-of-motion-conserved-qua/info.md
- 03 · _intake0.724
> that the divergence has a product rule, the derivative of Lambda with G mu nu left alone, plus Lambda times the derivative of G mu nu, that the derivative of G mu nu dies, that means that the only thing that you can count on is, is that the derivative of Lambda has to die. That is what doomed Einstein to having to include this goddamn term in his equation, which he never liked because it was just, there were three terms. There was the beautiful term,
_intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/einstein/005-that-the-divergence-has-a-product-rule-the-derivative-of-lam.md
- 04 · yt0.717
Oh, I was saying, okay, so in the principal polynomial, I can imagine that there's a lot of theoretical considerations. I can imagine how you can get symmetry or anti-symmetry conditions. I can imagine how you can get signature. I can imagine how you get that it is non-degenerate or that is degenerate. But I don't see how you get compatibility with connection as a condition of the principal polynomial. But there's no connection at all. So, okay, what we call signature in the metric, if I look at it from t…
yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt
- 05 · yt0.717
and that technically can sort of accommodate dark energy, but it's preposterous. So assume that the experimental result fell apart. I'd be in the same place I was in the 80s. This is not going to hold. This is completely artificial. Einstein was correct. And if he had the courage of his convictions, I think what he would have done is to recognize that the entire Einstein field equations cannot live on in this fashion where you've got one term that's perfect and two terms that are unggainainely to say the least and preposterous to say more. You know, we were talking in particular about a piece …
yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.710
Prof: It's the state of definite energy. Remember, we said functions of definite energy obey that equation. So that Y is really just Y_E. So now I'll put these two pieces together, and this is where those of you who drifted off can come back, because what I'm telling you is that the Schrˆdinger equation in fact admits a certain solution which is a product of a function of time and a function of space. And what we found by fiddling around with it is that F(t) and Y are very special, and F(t) must look like e^(‚àíiEt/ ‚Ñè), and Y is just our friend, Y _E(x), which are functions associated with a…
yt/Iy6RspNw80E-24-quantum-mechanics-vi-time-dependent-schr-dinger-equation/transcript.txt
- 07 · yt0.710
I'm going to make a space-like hypersurface in the language of relativity, that is in the more mathematical language, you can say that there's a partially ordered set of these events and this so-called anti chain. It's a thing that goes across, where every event that's in this kind of space-like hypersurface can be said to be happening simultaneously. Then, there's another space-like hypersurface where those events are all time-like separated from the ones on the previous space-like hypersurface. Okay, so…
yt/yAJTctpzp5w-can-space-and-time-emerge-from-simple-rules-stephen-wolfram-/transcript.txt
- 08 · yt0.708
I accept general relativity, but everything we do is slightly wrong. We call, we call Pati-Salam by the wrong name. We have the wrong grand unified real forms of the group. SU five is really SU three comma, uh, SU three comma two. SO 10 is really spin 10 and spin 10 is really spin six comma four. Like the amount of wear and tear on the mind to hear somebody say, no, no, no. I accept all these things, but we've, we've minorly got everything shifted. I think there's a huge barrier to entry in Geo. But …
yt/ILlhFKuu3NQ-geometric-unity-unifying-all-forces-generations-eric-weinste/transcript.txt
- 09 · pubmed0.707
We use the subleading soft-graviton theorem to construct an operator T_{zz} whose insertion in the four-dimensional tree-level quantum gravity S matrix obeys the Virasoro-Ward identities of the energy momentum tensor of a two-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT_{2}). The celestial sphere at Minkowskian null infinity plays the role of the Euclidean sphere of the CFT_{2}, with the Lorentz group acting as the unbroken SL(2,C) subgroup.
pubmed/PMID-29341660-2d-stress-tensor-for-4d-gravity/info.md
- 10 · yt0.706
But what actually happens with the observable is, is that you have a function and you can either measure the function at the point and then multiply it by the quantum wave, or you can take that function, differentiate it to get a one form, stick it into a symplectic form to get a vector field, throw the vector field to a connection and use that connection to take a directional derivative. So one of these ends up as the position operator. One of these sort of ends up as a momentum operator for the &nb…
yt/ILlhFKuu3NQ-geometric-unity-unifying-all-forces-generations-eric-weinste/transcript.txt
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/01-mathematics/