bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

einstein

you have an effective theory, right? So the idea is that or an anomalous triangle diagram or an inconsistent regularization procedure. So GU is not chiral, but it has to produce a chiral world because effective at an effective level, nature is chiral. So what you have is you have a field, a VEV in a Dirac like operator. Again, this Dirac-Rurita-Schwinger thing that comes up to meet the scalar curvature a scalar curvature in the Einstein equation analog of GU. So GU has a,
Concept
einstein
Score
6 · must · causes · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · openalex-fanout0.760

    - (1989) **The cosmological constant problem** — Steven Weinberg — cited 7197x - (1984) **Chiral perturbation theory to one loop** — J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler — cited 4015x - (2009) **Event generation with SHERPA 1.1** — T. Gleisberg, Stefan Höche — cited 2023x - (1984) **Chiral quarks and the non-relativistic quark model** — Aneesh V. Manohar, Howard Georgi — cited 1923x - (2009) **Modern theory of nuclear forces** — E. Epelbaum, H.‐W. Hammer — cited 1845x - (1982) **Quark masses** — J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler — cited 1750x - (1994) **QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian** — Te

    openalex-fanout/W4232639452-phenomenological-lagrangians/info.md

  2. 02 · openalex-fanout0.758

    (1989) The cosmological constant problem — cited 7197x (1984) Chiral perturbation theory to one loop — cited 4015x (2009) Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 — cited 2023x (1984) Chiral quarks and the non-relativistic quark model — cited 1923x (2009) Modern theory of nuclear forces — cited 1845x (1982) Quark masses — cited 1750x (1994) QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian — cited 1607x (2003) Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory — cited 1556x (2011) Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces — cited 1550x (1984

    openalex-fanout/W4232639452-phenomenological-lagrangians/info.md

  3. 03 · pubmed0.756

    An effective field theory of quarks, gluons, and pions, with the number N of colors treated as large, is proposed as a basis for calculations of hadronic phenomena at moderate energies. The qualitative consequences of the large N limit are similar though not identical to those in pure quantum chromodynamics, but because constituent quark masses appear in the effective Lagrangian, the 't Hooft coupling in the effective theory need not be strong at moderate energies. To leading order in 1/N the effective theory is renormalizable, with only a finite number of terms in the Lagrangian.

    pubmed/PMID-21231642-pions-in-large-n-quantum-chromodynamics/info.md

  4. 04 · pubmed0.755

    Powerful symmetry principles have guided physicists in their quest for nature's fundamental laws. The successful gauge theory of electroweak interactions postulates a more extensive symmetry for its equations than are manifest in the world. The discrepancy is ascribed to a pervasive symmetry-breaking field, which fills all space uniformly, rendering the Universe a sort of exotic superconductor. So far, the evidence for these bold ideas is indirect. But soon the theory will undergo a critical test depending on whether the quanta of this symmetry-breaking field, the so-called Higgs particles, ar

    pubmed/PMID-15662411-in-search-of-symmetry-lost/info.md

  5. 05 · yt0.753

    No, indeed, everything works out.   Even if you take non-abelian gauge theories.  I actually had a very good master's student,   Alexander Wirtz, he worked on that and we figured  out and no, nothing new comes up. We also tried to   use the same method to break… Because you see what  it is, if you say you have the matter actions,   say you keep the background constant  like an eta mu nu and a Minkowski metric,   right? Flat space. Then you could count these  eta mu nu as a constant. But the idea of gravity   i

    yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · openalex-fanout0.747

    - (1961) **Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. I** — Y. Nambu, G. Jona‐Lasinio — cited 5502x - (1963) **Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays** — N. Cabibbo — cited 4682x - (1961) **Partial-symmetries of weak interactions** — Sheldon L. Glashow — cited 4644x - (1969) **Axial-Vector Vertex in Spinor Electrodynamics** — Stephen L. Adler — cited 4291x - (1984) **Chiral perturbation theory to one loop** — J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler — cited 4015x - (1979) **Phenomenological Lagrangians** — Steven Weinberg — cited 3319x - (1969) **A PCAC puzzle: π0→γγ in t

    openalex-fanout/W2101447717-the-axial-vector-current-in-beta-decay/info.md

  7. 07 · openalex-fanout0.746

    (1961) Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. I — cited 5502x (1963) Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays — cited 4682x (1961) Partial-symmetries of weak interactions — cited 4644x (1969) Axial-Vector Vertex in Spinor Electrodynamics — cited 4291x (1984) Chiral perturbation theory to one loop — cited 4015x (1979) Phenomenological Lagrangians — cited 3319x (1969) A PCAC puzzle: π0→γγ in the σ-model — cited 3253x (1964) A schematic model of baryons and mesons — cited 2823x (1961) Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superco

    openalex-fanout/W2101447717-the-axial-vector-current-in-beta-decay/info.md

  8. 08 · yt0.746

    But I do want to know why are we not I I gave a formula for dark energy. You gave an interpretation of how dark energy can arise as I read it. explain how you gave a formula in the context of GR in the context of the Freeman equations as we teach our students we have an equation we have two equations what there's two Freedman equations one is for the first derivative of the scale factor and one is for the second der we cannot measure the scale factor so we use proxies to detect to determine what the should we say what the Freriedman equations are please do actually you should I don't know the

    yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.743

    How do you go from Maxwell's equations to the  action of Einstein and Hilbert? Spell that out. Okay. So, ask how does this bigger scheme  work in the special case if you would,   say, start with matter, that is  Maxwell electrodynamics, right? Yes. On some metric background. Let's not even say  Lorentzian, any metric, any signature. Well,   the first thing you would do is to… So, you  would find out for what background signature,   if you start with a metric like this, would you  have a well-defined Cauchy problem for Maxwell's &

    yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · yt0.742

    Oh, I was saying, okay, so in the principal   polynomial, I can imagine that there's a lot  of theoretical considerations. I can imagine   how you can get symmetry or anti-symmetry  conditions. I can imagine how you can get   signature. I can imagine how you get that it is  non-degenerate or that is degenerate. But I don't   see how you get compatibility with connection  as a condition of the principal polynomial. But there's no connection at all. So, okay, what  we call signature in the metric, if I look at it   from t

    yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/