bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

einstein

out in 1905 that based on the work of Helmolds and Herz, this is the only thing that makes sense and he wrote the paper. Here's the ironic thing. Einstein never did an
Concept
einstein
Score
7 · never · only
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.948

    > out in 1905 that based on the work of Helmolds and Herz, this is the only thing that makes sense and he wrote the paper. Here's the ironic thing. Einstein never did an

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/einstein/008-out-in-1905-that-based-on-the-work-of-helmolds-and-herz-this.md

  2. 02 · _intake0.770

    Einstein admitted in his writings that some of his theories he could not even fathom as a realist. The ‘uncertainty principle’ is one of the better examples. He did, however, believe there had to be a single theory that could prove the existence of atoms and accurately predict how groups of them would behave together. With his imagination as his canvas, he created the foundation of quantum mechanics. His first paper in 1905 was called, “**On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light**“. The title told us that even Einstein was not sure his reasoning was correc

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/quantum-biology-7-vitamin-d.md

  3. 03 · yt0.768

    He wrote down the thermodynamic givens of the ultraviolet catastrophe, and he looked at the thermodynamic givens. He goes, "How do these things all fit together?" And what happens in his miracle year? One of his four papers is called the photoelectric effect. Now, people like to believe that everything should be simple, that you could explain it to a third grader. That's like Occam's razor. And I always tell people when they say to me, "There's no way this could be right, Jack." I say, "Well, tell me, what is Occam's razor parsimonious about the photoelectric effect? That it only works with UV

    yt/yo4h0B_JMQY-dr-jack-kruse-explains-how-sunlight-controls-leptin-melanin-/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · _intake0.764

    Most of you know I hold Einstein in the highest regards with respect to my knowledge and wisdom. If it was not for his brilliance in 1905, I don’t think my life’s arrow would be pointed in the direction it is. Many of you might conclude that these feelings might set me up for confirmation bias or dogmatic beliefs regarding his work. Today’s blog is where I show you how the results of the last ten years of reading science are at odds with Einstein theories. The concept of time divorced me from some big parts of Einstein’s ideas. **When you believe “time” is just psychologic and not physical, as

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-18-divorcing-einstein-using-times-pointed-arrow.md

  5. 05 · yt0.761

    >> And and the thing >> I know Hilbert because it's Hilbert Space. Hbert Space. >> Tell me about that in a minute. But in this particular story, Einstein had visited Hilbert in June of 1915, showed him everything that he'd worked out for 10 years. Then Hilbert took it the final step and published before him. In the end of the day, Hilbert said, "No, no, it's your theory. It's your theory, Albert. I I'm not trying to take it from you." But he did publish a little before him. >> Even though he would not have published had Einstein not visited him. >> Yeah. He wouldn

    yt/NxMMd5kMu7o-exploring-hidden-dimensions-with-brian-greene/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.757

    Actually, Schrödinger did that,   right? Schrödinger had a modified idea. Again,  Schrödinger had an idea of modified gravity.   And he said, “no, no, no, no. Einstein does  these non-symmetric metrics. But actually,   a deeper structural concept than the  metric is the connection.” And there   are connections that come from a metric, and  they're more general connections, right? So,   that was Schrödinger's idea. Actually, a wonderful  book by Schrödinger, Space-Time Structure.   A very beautiful, thin book o

    yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · _intake0.755

    I got this idea by reading about the physics of how a cell is organized by Mae Wan Ho. She introduced me to Henri Bergson’s ideas of space/time. He was a philosopher who thought deeply about time. He made a huge impact on several other physicists that went on to win Noble Prizes using his ideas about dissipative systems. It turns out all cells in life, are a dissipative system of light. Cells are a playground for photons. He believed living things had highly differentiated space-time structures built into their design. His ideas were at odds with Einstein’s ideas of time relativity of a curved

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-18-divorcing-einstein-using-times-pointed-arrow.md

  8. 08 · yt0.752

    And so so this raises an important point about science and it's very elementary. Scientific theories start with assumptions. Like Einstein, the special theory of relativity, he started with the assumption that um the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames and that there is no special inertial frame. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames. And he said if you grant me those two assumptions then he could build actually um relativistic spacetime with all the the changing clocks and and meter stick lengths and the whole bit came from those assumptions and but he didn't d

    yt/xaeafKPfs1M-the-greatest-discovery-about-reality-the-consciousness-behin/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · yt0.752

    It's just the model. The point is, we are prepared for something that  hasn't happened yet, right? If somebody sees   matter that cannot have due to their behavior  a Lorentzian background but you would then,   phenomenologists would pretty quickly figure out  what may be the simplest background that could do   that, then the question comes up, but what's the  action for that background? It can't be Einstein,   right? Einstein is for a Lorentzian metric  or a metric in general. But then you would   try to solve our equa

    yt/Bnh-UNrxYZg-frederic-schuller-the-physicist-who-derived-gravity-from-ele/transcript.txt

  10. 10 · yt0.748

    Ground News aggregates thousands of local and international news outlets all in one place, so you can compare reporting across the political spectrum. Try it out at ground.news/alexoc. Take a look at this story about how 1ifth of pollinators in North America are at risk of extinction. On ground news, I can see that of all the sources reporting on this story, only 9% of them are right-leaning. This means that if you only normally tend to read rightle leaning news, you could have missed this story altogether. And Ground News even has a dedicated blind spot tab which specifically seeks out storie

    yt/o9z5il_FQUw-string-theory-multiverse-and-divine-design-brian-greene/transcript.txt

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/