bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

einstein

and if time is relative what did that do to the Newtonian Paradigm it blew it up but here's the interesting thing even though physics accepted but Einstein said in 1905 centralized medicine did not they still believe the way methodology should be done is cause and effect is real and we now know that everything in nature is based on probabilities well if you say that to a centralized doctor to this very day they are infuriated by this because
Concept
einstein
Cross-concepts
newton
Score
7 · causes · because · evidence
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.974

    > and if time is relative what did that do to the Newtonian Paradigm it blew it up but here's the interesting thing even though physics accepted but Einstein said in 1905 centralized medicine did not they still believe the way methodology should be done is cause and effect is real and we now know that everything in nature is based on probabilities well if you say that to a centralized doctor to this very day they are infuriated by this because

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/einstein/003-and-if-time-is-relative-what-did-that-do-to-the-newtonian-pa.md

  2. 02 · _intake0.807

    Descartes, Newton, and Einstein all failed to harness the concept of time into their ideas. So how did they handle it? **They solved the paradox of time by eliminating it from their equations.** Einstein made the famous quote that, time was the illusion of the mind. Is it really? According to Sir Albert, contrary to biologic evidence, time like space is measured reversibly. A third grader can show Einstein life breaks this rule. When we drop an egg can we somehow reverse the broken egg on the floor to the egg’s previous form before the fall? Of course not. Biology has a pointed arrow. Newtonia

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-18-divorcing-einstein-using-times-pointed-arrow.md

  3. 03 · _intake0.807

    Most of you know I hold Einstein in the highest regards with respect to my knowledge and wisdom. If it was not for his brilliance in 1905, I don’t think my life’s arrow would be pointed in the direction it is. Many of you might conclude that these feelings might set me up for confirmation bias or dogmatic beliefs regarding his work. Today’s blog is where I show you how the results of the last ten years of reading science are at odds with Einstein theories. The concept of time divorced me from some big parts of Einstein’s ideas. **When you believe “time” is just psychologic and not physical, as

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-18-divorcing-einstein-using-times-pointed-arrow.md

  4. 04 · _intake0.802

    In physics, there is nothing that really corresponds to now or the present. Special relativity has shown us that the “present” is also subjective to the context we use it. Einstein taught us with relativity theory that time is always relative in the universe. One of the most odd aspects of the Theory of realtivity, from my perspective, is that it says our experience of the passage of time does not need to reflect a fundamental aspect of the reality we observe. Therefore, it should raise the question, if time is not fundamental, where does it come from, and why do we have vivid experience of th

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/reality-1-holes-reality-make-time.md

  5. 05 · yt0.786

    This phenomenon, often called spooky action at a distance by Einstein, implies a faster than light influence seemingly contradicting relativity. The Nobel Prize-winning experiments precisely tested this conflict. They demonstrated that the instantaneous correlation predicted by quantum theory held true even when local hidden variables were ruled out. In essence, the experiments proved that quantum theory won. They confirmed the existence of these instantaneous non-local effects directly contradicting the classical local realism implied by Einsteinian relativity. Smith notes the immense signifi

    yt/ldWRGJ7PaK0-0-bridging-cosmos-consciousness-and-humanity-a-deeper-scienc/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · _intake0.783

    > why is there no cause and effect this will be the most mindblowing thing I tell you to have a cause and effect in reality requires you have to use Newtonian physics meaning that time has

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/newton/003-why-is-there-no-cause-and-effect-this-will-be-the-most-mindb.md

  7. 07 · _intake0.781

    > it right. He didn't figure out the second law. As we now know, sort of the paradigmatic ideas that you need to figure out the second law come from ideas about computation and so on, which were another close to 100 years in the future, so to speak. But it's sort of interesting that he was applying those kinds of philosophical thinking ideas. And it was a misfire in thermodynamics. It was a hit in relativity, in the photoelectric effect, and the existence of photons, and also

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/photoelectric/003-it-right.md

  8. 08 · _intake0.780

    - **Albert <<Einstein>> E=Mc²** - `archive/AlbertEinsteinEMc … - **photoelectric-biology** - `_intake/concept-digests/photoelectric-biology.md` - … <<einstein>>-albert.md` - … Even time is <<<<relative>>>> according to <<<<Einstein>>>> and now you might be understanding why. It is also critical in constructing … - **<<<<photoelectric>> … - **TIME #7: THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT** - `_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/time-7-photoelectric-effect.md` - … proving <<Einstein>> correct. <<Einstein>> actually won the Nobel Prize for his work on the <<photoelectric>> effect and not for the Theory of <<R

    _intake/canon-profiles/einstein-albert.md

  9. 09 · archive0.779

    we cannot speak of a direction of time as a whole; only certain sections of time have directions, and these directions are not the same. The first to have the courage to draw this conclusion was Ludwig Boltzmann [Gas Theory, Part II, §90]. His conception of alternating time directions represents one of the keenest insights into the problem of time. Philosophers have attempted to derive the properties of time from reason; but none of their conceptions compares with this result that a physicist derived from reasoning about the implications of mathematical physics. As in so many other respects, t

    archive/lectures-on-gas-theory-ludwig-boltzmann/Lectures on Gas Theory - Ludwig Boltzmann_djvu.txt

  10. 10 · _intake0.778

    Einstein also used a thought experiment involving time as he visualized riding on a lighten bolt through space to come up with the Theory of Relativity. These two great men of science realized** time** was the key ingredient. Soon, I am going to show you why I decided to use it too, as well, to figure out this riddle of our modern world.

    _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/emf-6-quantum-time.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/02-physics/