dark energy, which is less politely called negative mass matter or negative mass stuff is what is associated with the zero kind of thing. Whether dark energy is a real thing, I'm not yet convinced experimentally, but that's a different issue. Then there's dark matter, which has been known about. Some signs of it have been known for a hundred years. My own guess is that again, a bit of a mistake was made in calling it dark matter because that implies that it must
- Concept
- dark matter
- Cross-concepts
- dark energy
- Score
- 4 · must · because
- Status
- candidate — not yet promoted to canon
Corpus evidence — top 10 passages
Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).
- 01 · yt0.753
Dark matter is exactly such a particle. We believe there are dark matter particles in the universe. Most of the mass of the universe by energy is dark matter. We believe that there are probably millions or billions of dark matter particles flying through this room right now and we don't care because they go right through. They do not interact with us. To affect our everyday lives in any way, this new particle would have to interact substantially with the particles that we know are in us like electrons, protons, and neutrons. So imagine there's some new interaction. There's a new particle that …
yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt
- 02 · yt0.734
It's a pushing out that it does. It's a pressure, an outward pressure, that the gravitational force is pushing against. ♪ ♪ Overall, the universe is accelerating in its expansion because of this dark energy effect. ♪ ♪ NARRATOR: Today, scientists estimate it is overwhelmingly the most prevalent form of energy in the universe. RHODES: We thought we knew the constituents of the universe and how it was evolving over time. Al of a sudden, we found out that, no, we didn't know, because the biggest component of the universe wasn't dark matter, it was dark energy. NARRATOR: So, what exactly is dark e…
yt/5BNPeFHU7QQ-decoding-the-universe-cosmos-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt
- 03 · yt0.723
Some scientists have actually been known to cut infinite numbers when they find them because they're deliberately looking for finitness [music] instead of embracing the infinite nature of reality. Check out the movie Black Hole. to see this happening in action. Particles are called particles because they're too small to be seen by instruments we have in science at this time. What that means is that we don't really know what particles even are. If we knew what they were, they would not be particles anymore. They would be described. There is kind of a broken dichotomy that is happening in this f…
yt/1hBRzz1VmK0-sacred-geometry-explained-like-never-before/transcript.txt
- 04 · blog0.719
All chaotic energy states will either jump to a higher state, and stay there as long as the extra energy does, or it will ignore the extra force. When there isn't enough energy to maintain the element in this state, it drops to a specific lower state and sheds the excess energy. When this happens we see it as a burst of light which will be specific to each particular element. By examining the luminous evidence, astrophysicists can determine how much matter is shedding light. According to older theories all matter radiates light, and this could be used to determine how much matter was in Univer…
blog/www-sacred-texts-com/internet-book-of-shadows-kali-and-modern-physics-internet-sacred-text-archive.md
- 05 · yt0.717
NARRATOR: Direct dark matter detection experiments go back to the 1980s. Xenon-based experiments, similar in design to LZ, to the 2000s. So far, all the experiments combined have detected nothing. But the process constantly narrows down what dark matter could possibly be. And currently, LZ has time on its side. The plan is to accrue a total of three years' worth of data. GHAG: Hopefully, there'll be a direct detection and we'll start to understand the nature of it. It could be that dark matter isn't a simple one-size-fits-all WIMP. It could be that there's multiple different types of dark matt…
yt/5BNPeFHU7QQ-decoding-the-universe-cosmos-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt
- 06 · yt0.712
This is a really hard problem. NARRATOR: There aren't many clues. Aside from its gravitational effect, dark matter appears to interact very little with normal matter, and can pass right through it. It also emits no electromagnetic radiation, no light. There are forms of matter that simply don't glow like stars do, but actually they're also not responding to light. So they are invisible, except through their gravitational force. It probably is something quite exotic. It isn't any of the ordinary stuff. NARRATOR: So who are the suspects for dark matter? There are the MACHOs; the Massive Compact …
yt/5BNPeFHU7QQ-decoding-the-universe-cosmos-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt
- 07 · yt0.711
CLIFFORD JOHNSON: Perhaps the reason we hadn't noticed it before is because the way you measure it is in terms of how much is it per unit of space time. Perhaps a little chunk of space right here. So you have to divide the entire effect by the volume of the observable universe. So that makes it a very small number. NARRATOR: Imagine the energy released by a match head burning. (hissing, flame roaring) The estimated equivalent in dark energy is spread across a cube of empty space with an edge about seven and a half miles long-- or the amount of space contained by about one and half million Astr…
yt/5BNPeFHU7QQ-decoding-the-universe-cosmos-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt
- 08 · openalex-fanout0.706
- (2006) **DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGY** — Edmund J. Copeland, M. Sami — cited 6150x - (2009) **FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE</i>OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION** — Eiichiro Komatsu, J. Dunkley — cited 5708x - (2003) **The cosmological constant and dark energy** — P. J. E. Peebles, Bharat Ratra — cited 5181x - (2010) **<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>** — Thomas P. Sotiriou, Valerio Faraoni — cited 4408x - (2012) **Modified gravity and cosmology** — Timothy Clifton, Pedro G. Ferreir…
openalex-fanout/W2056173066-the-cosmological-constant-problem/info.md
- 09 · _intake0.705
I believe this is why it’s colder and darker inside the Sun, as opposed to the surface temperatures. These anomalies need to be resolved. I believe we will find out the same thing is true about mitochondria eventually too. All fusion reactions are believed to occur in the sun, takes place near the photosphere. It is here, where massive electrical arcs come into contact with free ionized hydrogen particles. These hydrogen ions are high energy particles. I have a sense that the same thing happens in mitochondria, but with low energy H+ ions. ***Physicists tells us that the small quantum world do…
_intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/sea-of-change-could-be-a-sea-of-charge.md
- 10 · yt0.703
and that technically can sort of accommodate dark energy, but it's preposterous. So assume that the experimental result fell apart. I'd be in the same place I was in the 80s. This is not going to hold. This is completely artificial. Einstein was correct. And if he had the courage of his convictions, I think what he would have done is to recognize that the entire Einstein field equations cannot live on in this fashion where you've got one term that's perfect and two terms that are unggainainely to say the least and preposterous to say more. You know, we were talking in particular about a piece …
yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt
Curation checklist
- ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
- ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
- ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
- ☐ Promote to
bucket-canon/06-cosmology/