bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

dark matter

it's an odd term yes I think so it's a little confusing because it's dark matter as well which is quite different you know she must yeah I'm confused with the dark energy as it's
Concept
dark matter
Cross-concepts
dark energy
Score
4 · must · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · yt0.761

    Now to the uh proverbial uh the implications of the dark energy changing is are astonishing if indeed it's true. There are many things that can happen. The cosmological constant can slowly change sort of asmtoically changing to some value. It could get bigger. It could get smaller, right? It changes. It's not going to be a constant. It won't be a constant, right? So, the dark energy term will evolve. Can't evolve. We parameterize it by these two terms, omega or wa. Those are both the equations of state which govern the existence and the the net effect of the scale factor on distance. How the s

    yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt

  2. 02 · yt0.758

    But when I saw that I said the molecules of air that are around her are in a different place cuz she's displacing these molecules relative to these. That's a different universe. >> I'm not going to look at these as just this is the only thing that has to stay constant. Tell me about all the other little things that change relative to the big thing that you notice. >> Yeah. So, in that version, I think you're right. You know, if the person could really go back in time, change things, I think you would get a different universe. I I don't know of any uber law that says certain major e

    yt/NxMMd5kMu7o-exploring-hidden-dimensions-with-brian-greene/transcript.txt

  3. 03 · yt0.758

    There's been some back and forth just in the last couple weeks about well maybe it's not ex maybe the acceleration is slowing down and and it it I think the the jury is out on that. Right. Right. So right now this the the model that the Nobel Prize winning result is that it's accelerating and there's something called dark energy. We don't know what it is. Um, and then there's some new, you know, the type 1A supernovas may not be the quite the standard candle that we thought they were. There's there's a big debate going on about that right now. But anyway, the there's no doubt the universe is e

    yt/Hf1q-bZMEo4-what-are-traces-of-consciousness-a-new-breakthrough-unifying/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.758

    We always say the acronyms if it's well I I have to be careful because I'm married to an Indian woman uh and the word for country in Hindi is des uh they refer to themselves as when you heard about this news I mean obviously this is not something you posted retrodicted and put in just before our talk right so this is must been something that from the 1980s right so this must have been something that you've been thinking about for quite some time so how how did you react when you heard the news now we should say in that seat last week was the spokesperson, former spokesperson Desi, still leader

    yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.752

    It's not somehow a magical. is not made of a magical classical substance that's has different physics to it. So why should I have to make this distinction? As I said, why isn't this just a regular physical interaction between two physical things? Now the the little piece of data I'll just mention is is Adam Becker wrote a nice book called What is Real? which was a popular book about Bell and about David Bow and about Hugh Everett and certain people who were running against this stream of mainstream physics. Uh he was very critical of Bor and Copenhogen in the book and he has a degree in cosmol

    yt/VbXEc9vpeIM-what-we-ve-gotten-wrong-about-quantum-physics-world-science-/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.750

    So that such that when we observe light from a galaxy or from a supernova or from a barrier acoustic oscillation which is what Desi's measuring, we are not seeing it as it is right now. We're seeing it as it was when that light was emitted, propagated along light cones as light does. And then uh we can actually translate that back to the physical separation at the time of the emission or the physical separation today which called the proper distance. We have different proxies for those. Then we plug those into again the uh this this red shift distance relationship. And the startling thing is n

    yt/BVkUya368Es-why-people-are-terrified-of-eric-weinstein-s-geometric-unity/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.749

    Dark matter is exactly such a particle. We believe there are dark matter particles in the universe. Most of the mass of the universe by energy is dark matter. We believe that there are probably millions or billions of dark matter particles flying through this room right now and we don't care because they go right through. They do not interact with us. To affect our everyday lives in any way, this new particle would have to interact substantially with the particles that we know are in us like electrons, protons, and neutrons. So imagine there's some new interaction. There's a new particle that

    yt/rqezWO5Yba8-sean-carrol-the-big-picture-on-the-origins-of-life-meaning-a/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · yt0.747

    But the second thing  is how long or how do people reconcile these two   radically different pictures? I mean, we used to  say from special relativity, your clock is going   slow. My clock, we can get our minds around.  This one just seems so radically bizarre. Kip: Well, I think we generally do it by   finding a third point of view where everything  fits together in a beautifully elegant way. Brian: Like Finkelstein. Kip: Yeah,   so called Eddington-Finkelstein coordinate system.  And so you basically, if you adopt this idea tha

    yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

  9. 09 · blog0.746

    I think it is natural to take the viewpoint that any axiomatic structure, such as the sciences, can only explain certain types of phenomena. Other systems, such as magick, can explain other phenomena. It is interesting that these different axiomatic structures can overlap: they can explain the same types of phenomena, but they explain them in different ways. One might call different axiomatic systems as "paradigms," or "representations." Whatever you call them, it is important not to mix the different systems, because the any term defined in one representation are not likely to have the same m

    blog/www-sacred-texts-com/physics-and-the-basic-principle-of-visualization-magick.md

  10. 10 · _intake0.745

    > But understanding it, may hold the key to the very structure of the universe. My mum is always like, you know, "Why do we have to care about dark matter?" And, and the truth is

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/dark-matter/001-but-understanding-it-may-hold-the-key-to-the-very-structure-.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/06-cosmology/