bucket foundation — inverse omegabucket.foundation

consciousness

So a computer can never be conscious because it doesn't have the characteristics of free will. Can you speak on how you were very much so trying to create consciousness through
Concept
consciousness
Cross-concepts
free will
Score
7 · never · causes · because
Status
candidate — not yet promoted to canon

Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

  1. 01 · _intake0.957

    > So a computer can never be conscious because it doesn't have the characteristics of free will. Can you speak on how you were very much so trying to create consciousness through

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/consciousness/005-so-a-computer-can-never-be-conscious-because-it-doesn-t-have.md

  2. 02 · _intake0.924

    > computers can never be conscious because consciousness is a property that requires quantum states which are not reproducible. You see, so if you start with conscience and free will, you can

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/consciousness/006-computers-can-never-be-conscious-because-consciousness-is-a-.md

  3. 03 · yt0.845

    And I want to ask you, at what level could a computer even in principle experience both happiness the happiest thought of its existence, A, and B, the bodily sensation of free fall. In other words, the emperor and the emperor's new mind, how could it even come close to this revelation which then led to GR and and the equivalence principle and everything else? In other words, are you sanguine about artificial intelligences becoming conscious? Or how could they if if so? Well, they wouldn't. I mean, my view is that if you're just looking at computation, that doesn't involve consciousness. And th

    yt/OoDi856wLPM-sir-roger-penrose-stuart-hameroff-collapsing-a-theory-of-qua/transcript.txt

  4. 04 · yt0.845

    I mean already quantum physics is telling you that a particle that is not looked at is not even in space and time is is you can only be described in a deeper reality and only when you measure it. In other words, when a field interacts with another field which is the field of an instrument, you have an event that manifests in space and time and then you can say, you know, there is a particle here, for example. But quantum physics cannot tell you where you will find the particle. It can only tell you the probability of all the possibilities in which you could potentially find the particle. So th

    yt/d6NHRB5V1eE-top-physicist-science-spirituality-merge-in-this-new-theory-/transcript.txt

  5. 05 · yt0.840

    You see, you could you could make it random, but that's not the point of free will. You could say that. You see, people often say that free will could be there if it's not deterministic. But it doesn't do you any good if it's just random. Yeah. So, the view I have is is more or less this. It's not even my It's a fairly recent view, I think. But the view is more this. There is something retrocausal about it. What free will really means and what I'm arguing for here is not that you can do anything you like and you can act randomly if you like. You're doing what you think is the right thing to do

    yt/nok4GhijvAA-is-consciousness-related-to-quantum-physics-with-roger-penro/transcript.txt

  6. 06 · yt0.835

    And now I have a full blown theory of consciousness in free will that. Explain the conscious and free will cannot be. Produced either by a quantum classical system like our body and, and even less by a classical, a classical computer like the ones that the host artificial intelligence. And so is fundamental that we understand that we are much more than computers in a day when we are told that we are machines, just like computers. In fact, not so good because computers will, you know, will overcome our intelligence pretty soon if they haven't done it already. So, I, you know, now I'm really on

    yt/w6cBQESNDV0-federico-faggin-merging-science-spirituality-quantum-physics/transcript.txt

  7. 07 · yt0.830

    Well, you see, I think it's not I mean, that is an interesting question, because it doesn't seem to me necessary that consciousness is causal in some sense I can imagine somebody being paralyzed completely. I get this happens. People are completely paralyzed and nobody can tell whether that person is actually conscious or not. And later on, you find that person may wake up at some sense and you find they were conscious all the time. They knew what was going on. It's just they couldn’t influence anything in some sense this notion of being. We have a free will in the sense of affecting things is

    yt/0nOtLj8UYCw-quantum-consciousness-debate-does-the-wave-function-actually/transcript.txt

  8. 08 · _intake0.822

    - [`001-that-needs-to-be-held-as-distinct-from-an-ontological-premis`](consciousness/001-that-needs-to-be-held-as-distinct-from-an-ontological-premis.md) — score=9 `00:58:14.799` — that needs to be held as distinct from an ontological premise that the brain causes Consciousness so it might be I never - [`002-consciousness-here-i-think-it-s-there-are-very-few-areas-in-`](consciousness/002-consciousness-here-i-think-it-s-there-are-very-few-areas-in-.md) — score=8 `00:28:45.179` — consciousness here I think it's there are very few areas in science where the accepted explanation is totally a brute

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated/INDEX.md

  9. 09 · _intake0.822

    - [`001-that-needs-to-be-held-as-distinct-from-an-ontological-premis`](consciousness/001-that-needs-to-be-held-as-distinct-from-an-ontological-premis.md) — score=9 `00:58:14.799` — that needs to be held as distinct from an ontological premise that the brain causes Consciousness so it might be I never - [`002-consciousness-here-i-think-it-s-there-are-very-few-areas-in-`](consciousness/002-consciousness-here-i-think-it-s-there-are-very-few-areas-in-.md) — score=8 `00:28:45.179` — consciousness here I think it's there are very few areas in science where the accepted explanation is totally a brute

    _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/INDEX.md

  10. 10 · pubmed0.820

    As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance, it is natural to ask whether AI systems can be not only intelligent, but also conscious. I consider why people might think AI could develop consciousness, identifying some biases that lead us astray. I ask what it would take for conscious AI to be a realistic prospect, challenging the assumption that computation provides a sufficient basis for consciousness. I'll instead make the case that consciousness depends on our nature as living organisms - a form of biological naturalism. I lay out a range of scenarios for conscious AI, concluding th

    pubmed/PMID-40257177-conscious-artificial-intelligence-and-biological-naturalism/info.md

Curation checklist

  • ☐ Verify excerpt against source recording
  • ☐ Tag tier (axiom · law · principle · primary derivation · observation)
  • ☐ Cross-cite to ≥1 primary source (PubMed / arXiv / archive.org)
  • ☐ Promote to bucket-canon/07-mind/