Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · yt0.796

   And  one of the deepest way to understand Hawking   radiation was one that Steven Hawking and his  colleague, James Hartle, worked out in which   there actually is a connection to the singularity  inside that gives rise to the Hawking radiation. Brian: But that's interesting because   the Hawking radiation as I... And maybe you're  going to enlighten me in ways that... Usually   we describe it as pair production, the event  horizon of a black hole, one particle falls in,   the other strings away and so forth. And it's&n…

   yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

2. 02 · yt0.760

   They said, "Well, there must be a much bigger spread so that there's no no radiation." And they calculated this the smear factor, quite literally they called it the smear factor R zero would have to be on the order of an angstrom, five orders of magnitude bigger than what we had said. And that's for the nucleus, which makes the the atom bigger than the almost as big as a cell, you know, bigger than the the protein for sure. It'd be a micron. So, that didn't make any sense, but but that that made them happy because then they they could account for the lack of radiation. And but then they kind o…

   yt/OoDi856wLPM-sir-roger-penrose-stuart-hameroff-collapsing-a-theory-of-qua/transcript.txt

3. 03 · yt0.756

   Then are you learning about part of the universe that you're supposedly unable to access by virtue of the entangled partner on the other side? And the most conventional answer from general relativity is yes, right? So if you measure that entangled member on the outside and it's spinning up, then you will have learned that the one on the inside is spinning down. Now, that doesn't actually violate any insights. What black holes really stipulate and they're defined by is a better way of saying it is that a light beam can't escape. Nothing can escape. When you do this, nothing's escaping. You're l…

   yt/nH8c60ZbSgw-live-q-a-with-brian-greene-world-science-festival/transcript.txt

4. 04 · yt0.745

   But that analysis was the thing that finally   I think got people who were highly  skeptical to throw in the towel and say,   okay, you don't have to pause it, pretend to  think that this Hawking radiation forms with   humongously high energies and then waits a  million years trying to climb out with its   energy decaying lower and lower and lower until  it finally comes out, which feels like nonsense.  So there was this period that was in the '70s,  when this was all being sorted out, that when the   tools that we…

   yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

5. 05 · yt0.742

   It's seething with possibility. Instead of having empty space here, a particle and its antiparticle can appear, dance around a little bit, and then annihilate back into empty space. Now, imagine that happening near a black hole horizon, which we're told is a one-way door. What if one of those particles falls in? And now the partner doesn't have anything to annihilate with. So it will actually fly off, and a distant observer will see that particle as radiation coming from the black hole. NARRATOR: Without consuming more matter, if it emits radiation, it will gradually shrink in size. The black …

   yt/t06aTX9jM34-decoding-the-universe-quantum-full-documentary-nova-pbs/transcript.txt

6. 06 · yt0.733

   It's not why does the electron have its particular charge or its particular mass? Because it doesn't. In other universes, it has different values. Then the question is, instead, why are we in a universe with the particular values that we happen to measure? And the answer is may [clears throat] well be, we simply couldn't exist in any of the other universes. And so, you have to, I think, leave yourself open to this way of thinking. If you can find a more fundamental explanation, God bless you. Write it up. Publish it. Go to Stockholm. Fantastic. But, no one's been able to do that. And so, in th…

   yt/nH8c60ZbSgw-live-q-a-with-brian-greene-world-science-festival/transcript.txt

7. 07 · _intake0.733

   The real question is do electrons from different macronutrients have specific [quantum biologic](/the-quilthow-to-beat-agin/#GeopathicStressors) effects? Many of the things that have been mathematically predicted by Einstein’s quantum mechanical theory have been proven true by science today. For example, the presence of a black hole, a quasar, or the fact that time bends at the speed of light. When he first made the predictions he was mocked. He predicted a quasar and a black hole in the 20’s and until the Hubble telescope was deployed recently, we did not know for sure. We now know he was cor…

   _intake/kruse-blog-corpus/articles/do-food-electrons-impart-a-quantum-effect.md

8. 08 · yt0.732

   And in fact, for the most part, Isaac Newton does do the calculations for us even today, because Newtonian gravity, even though we've gone beyond it with Einsteinian gravity, general relativity, and even though we're trying to push the frontiers with quantum gravity, for everyday situations, by which I mean situations that are amenable to the naked eye. If you can sort of see things, you can see the moon, you can see the Artemis spacecraft itself, that's your big hint that ordinary Newtonian gravity is all that you need. So, yeah, is there always a chance that some kind of anomaly that we didn…

   yt/nH8c60ZbSgw-live-q-a-with-brian-greene-world-science-festival/transcript.txt

9. 09 · yt0.728

   That when stuff  falls into it, it changes its whole character.  So by contrast with the horizon of a  black hole, which is highly stable,   you perturb it and it vibrates a bit and then  settles back down. It's just so stable. You can't   blast it apart. By the contrast, what's going  on down beneath there is highly unstable. And   when stuff falls in, the gravity of the  stuff that falls in completely changes   what's going on down inside the black hole. So as best we understand it today, and this is   part of th…

   yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

10. 10 · blog0.727

    Two years later, Max Black (1956) presented an argument against backward causation, which became known as the bilking argument, and later attempts to meet the argument seemed to generate all kinds of paradoxes. Imagine \(B\) to be earlier than \(A\), and let \(B\) be the alleged effect of \(A\). Thus, we assume that \(A\) causes \(B\), even though \(A\) is later than \(B\). The idea behind the bilking argument is that whenever \(B\) has occurred, it is possible, in principle, to intervene in the course of events and prohibit \(A\) from occurring. But if this is the case, \(A\) cannot be the ca…

    blog/plato-stanford-edu/backward-causation.md