Corpus evidence — top 10 passages

Most-relevant passages from the entire indexed corpus (67,286 paragraph chunks across YouTube transcripts, PubMed, arXiv, archive.org, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, OpenAlex, and more) ranked by semantic similarity (bge-small-en-v1.5).

1. 01 · _intake0.970

   > fly by. It's not like it was speeding up for the crewmate because everything is time as it always is. It's always the time that you experience. But relative to the clock near the black hole, which

   _intake/claims-allbranch/curated-low/black-hole/004-fly-by.md

2. 02 · yt0.828

   Kip: But if I fall into the black   hole or I ride on the surface of a star that's  shrinking to form a black hole and you're outside,   time for me, as you see time, my time slowing to  a halt, so you see me going to slow motion then   freeze right at the horizon because my time is  halted compared to the rate of flow of your time.  On the other hand from my point of view, time  just flows willy-nilly forward, and I go through   the horizon, and I keep on going. But once I'm  inside the horizon, time flows in what you would…

   yt/PTs--eFrzGo-greatest-mysteries-of-gravity-brian-greene-kip-thorne-world-/transcript.txt

3. 03 · yt0.811

   That's the origin of something like the twin paradox, or when gravity comes into the game, the amount of total time you experience will be less if you're deep in a gravitational field than if you're out there in interstellar space, where gravity is not that important. So in general relativity, being a strong gravitational field is much like moving out there close to the speed of light. If you had someone stay back here on Earth, someone else go near a black hole, for example, a black hole is the strongest kind of gravitational field you can have. Don't go in to the black hole because then you …

   yt/_TBNJyztai0-sean-carroll-explains-the-biggest-ideas-in-the-universe-full/transcript.txt

4. 04 · yt0.807

   So if if if you're moving with respect to me, I'm I'm you know, I'm sitting here. I'm thinking of myself as being still and you're moving past me at at a uniform speed. If if you're at a uniform speed with respect to me, you're not accelerating, then I will see your clock as going slower. And if you as you approach the speed of light, if you're going near the speed of light, I will see your clock very very close to not moving at all. And if you are going the speed of light, I will see your clock has stopped. But similarly, if if if I'm not accelerating with respect to you. So, and you're looki…

   yt/xaeafKPfs1M-the-greatest-discovery-about-reality-the-consciousness-behin/transcript.txt

5. 05 · yt0.806

   Well, the dominant thing that you'd notice is that your companion near the edge of the black hole would be in slow motion compared to you because you know, one of the deep insights of general relativity that I don't think has fully spread throughout even the scientifically savvy part of our world, which is distressingly smaller than we would like it to be is that what Einstein really showed with general relativity is that you can think about gravity at least in the familiar context like the Earth or even a black hole, you can think of gravity as that which slows the passage of time. Especially…

   yt/nH8c60ZbSgw-live-q-a-with-brian-greene-world-science-festival/transcript.txt

6. 06 · yt0.793

   Now, here's where your intuition starts to bleed because you've been quietly worshiping one more hidden assumption. You assume there's one universal clock, one master metronome [music] in the sky, one cosmic now that everybody shares everywhere. That's the secret religion of everyday life. Relativity murders it. Not with philosophy, [music] with measurement. Put a precise clock in a different gravitational field, [music] it ticks differently. put it in motion relative to you. It ticks differently. Time is not a single sheet laid over the universe. It's stitched into the way you move through sp…

   yt/q95GYzJlyYY-werner-heisenberg-explains-time-like-you-ve-never-seen-befor/transcript.txt

7. 07 · yt0.791

   The question is, "Can you tell if it's you who's responsible for this relative motion, or maybe nothing happened to you and the other train is moving the opposite way?" And the claim of relativity is that you really cannot tell. You can tell there is motion between the two trains that wasn't there before. That's very clear if you look outside but there is no way to tell what actually happened when you were sleeping. Whether you were given the velocity of 200 to the right or the other train was given a velocity of 200 to the left or maybe a combination of the two, you just cannot tell. That's t…

   yt/pHfFSQ6pLGU-12-introduction-to-relativity/transcript.txt

8. 08 · yt0.783

   At that time they cannot say we are at rest and everyone is going the opposite way because no one else is in danger, but they are. So, accelerated motion will produce effects. You cannot talk your way out of that. But uniform velocity will produce no effects on you and no effects on the other person. You can detect relative motion but you cannot in any sense maintain that you are moving and he's not or that he's moving and you are not. You can say, "I am at rest, things are the same as before, the train is moving the opposite way." Now, if you go in the Amtrak and you look outside and you don'…

   yt/pHfFSQ6pLGU-12-introduction-to-relativity/transcript.txt

9. 09 · yt0.780

   I'm at the origin of my coordinates, you're at the origin of your coordinates. When you pass me, we'll click our stop watches and we will set the time to zero. So, here's an event. You and I crossed. What are the coordinates for that event? According to me, that event occurred at x = 0 and the time was chosen to be zero. According to you, your origin was also on top of my origin, so x prime was zero and the time is just the time. Everybody has a single time, and that time is called zero. That is one event. We made the coordinate of the event zero zero for both you and me. It is zero in space b…

   yt/pHfFSQ6pLGU-12-introduction-to-relativity/transcript.txt

10. 10 · yt0.780

    Now, just using E = MC squared, just plug that in, and so you need E to be the dominant entity that is sourcing the gravity, as opposed to M, which is what we normally think about in the canonical way of thinking about things. But, if you squeeze it to 2GE / C to the fourth, you know, C to the fourth now because of E = MC squared, you can just go through it, then yeah, you will have a black hole made of light, right? It's kind of a cool idea, right? A black hole that forms from photons being sufficiently concentrated in a small enough region. If the universe were in absolute stasis, would time…

    yt/nH8c60ZbSgw-live-q-a-with-brian-greene-world-science-festival/transcript.txt